So I started thinking about this drawing process as I've gotten more and more involved in modeling these blobs of negative space in Rhino. It seems a bit odd to me to purposefully illustrate negative volumes of the networks we made.
The networks were never designed as a positive/negative space exercise. Also, the informational value of understanding the spaces seem like, at best, a rudimentary exercise in deriving one form from another.
Just a bit of the cart leading the horse in my (and a few other students') opinion(s).
Aside:
I wonder how many of my professors might actually read this. Hope my grade doesn't suffer.
And for the record, I do value the ability to draw. This exercise is nice in that respect, but I think it'd be better use of our time to draw something where the illustration process would inform us about something significant within the design or design process. I especially find it annoying as I've always felt that drawings are documents to inform. They have a goal and point. In this case, the actually drawing itself informs very little. And the information that it does convey seems all but moot.
But what does it mean??
8 Comments
I hate random pointless derivations simply for the sake of the excercise. This sounds like it would piss me off. Oh well, have as much fun as you can. I say, grab a couple coronas before sitting down at the ole computador, might make the process a bit more fun!
hmmm interesting... how's rhino working out for there? blobbing with rhino can be a pain...
i know this might come as a surprise, cause im kinda the biggest teknowhore in my studio.. but drawing can actually provide you with a quick way to test out possibilities...
im thinking about how in our last project, i had to decide on a window scheme for my building, and i had about 4 ideas in my head.. in 20 minutes i drew out 4 the four variations, killed two, modified the two others again and modified the other one once again as final choice.
the end result of having such a process documented in paper was strangely fulfilling.
i'd respond to myriam's comment but i too am a bit scared of my profs. reading this. :-P
it sound like your prof maybe is young. If they are, the're still learning what works to teach and what doesn't. If its Roger Sherman, its b/c he's a useless tub of crap.
I have seen the titled refreshed probably 80 times and I only just noticed that it's BLOBBY Fischer. Ha. ha ha ha. I need some sleep.
I don't know the project - but is rhino required? It sounds like a figure/ground type project forced into 3d.
Are you modeling in Lakers colors for a reason?
I think the problem started to arise because a lot of people in our program came in knowing, or at least being competent in CAD, which inevitably gave way to using laser-cut pieces for part one of the project. Which apparently has never been done before our class. As a result, we had projects that were extremely complicated morphologically. Thus, drawing axons/isos and such were much easier if modeled. Hence Rhino. And so, it's all discombobulated.
I think it would have been more clever if 10pm replaced "tub" with "blobjectular piece." I probably would have laughed then. ;)
Don't be scared of your profs, addictionbomb. They all drank in studio too. Trust me.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.