As many of us may know, it is World Cancer Day tomorrow, February 4, and the link between cancer and housing is not a well-kept secret anymore.
The ARCHIVE Institute works squarely at the intersection of housing and health, and aims to tackle and reduce rates of diseases such as cancer, by increasing awareness of the ways in which poor housing adversely affects health. Research has demonstrated an inextricable link between cancer and standards of housing.
The following article discusses radon, a natural radioactive gas found in homes identified to be the number one cause of lung cancer in non-smokers, and also the association between stomach cancer and poor living conditions. Poor housing environments contribute to ill health in many ways, through poor amenities, shared facilities and overcrowding, inadequate heating or energy inefficiency.
Full article from ARCHIVE after the jump.
As many of us may know, it is World Cancer Day tomorrow, February 4, and the link between cancer and housing is not a well-kept secret anymore.
The ARCHIVE Institute works squarely at the intersection of housing and health, and aims to tackle and reduce rates of diseases such as cancer, by increasing awareness of the ways in which poor housing adversely affects health. Research has demonstrated an inextricable link between cancer and standards of housing.
The following article discusses radon, a natural radioactive gas found in homes identified to be the number one cause of lung cancer in non-smokers, and also the association between stomach cancer and poor living conditions. Poor housing environments contribute to ill health in many ways, through poor amenities, shared facilities and overcrowding, inadequate heating or energy inefficiency.
Full article from ARCHIVE after the jump.
CANCER AND HOUSING
The ARCHIVE Inst works squarely at the intersection of housing and health: our work, therefore, seeks to use one fundamental right (housing) to deliver another (health). Housing is perhaps the ultimate nexus between the built environment and health disparities: it has been the focus of much recent research and intervention activity looking at new approaches to old problems1. Poor housing environments contribute to ill health most obviously through poor amenities, shared facilities and overcrowding, inadequate heating or energy inefficiency.
The relationship between cancer and standards of housing may initially seem vague; even non-existent. In fact, research has demonstrated an inextricable link between the two. Barker et al.’s 1990 study demonstrated the aetiological processes linking stomach cancer with poverty in England and Wales. They were able to relate mortality from stomach cancer in local authority areas of England and Wales to indices of poor living standards derived from 1971, 1951, and 1931 censuses. They also found that geographical differences in stomach cancer were closely related to measures of domestic overcrowding from the 1931 census, and 1936 surveys: historic levels of domestic overcrowding in northwest Wales were consistent with its previously unexplained high death rates from stomach cancer. It was concluded that overcrowding may be a major determinant of stomach cancer, and might act by promoting the transmission of causative organisms2.
Helicobacter Pylori is a bacterium that colonizes the stomach, and high prevalence of H Pylori infection has been linked with high gastric cancer rates. Prevalence of this micro-organism is closely linked to socio-economic factors, such as low income and poor living conditions during childhood - particularly inadequate sanitation and overcrowding3.
These factors aside, there remains one further, more direct link between cancer and the built environment. Radon is an odourless, colourless, natural radioactive gas formed by the breakdown of uranium found in soil, rocks beneath and around building foundations, ground water wells, and some building materials4. The most common source of radon poisoning in the home is from the soil used in potting plants and flowerbeds. Radon can also find its way into drinking water, though the risks in this case are much lower. The largest risk from radon-contaminated water comes from the gas being released into the air when water is used for showering and other household purposes5. Radon may be present in any home or building, regardless of age. Because it is a gas, it can leak into homes through the cellar, through cracks in concrete floors and walls, through floor drains and sump holes, or through well water. Ultimately, any home can be susceptible to radon poisoning6.
Though it does not elicit immediate symptoms, exposure to radon in homes can dramatically increase the risk of lung cancer7. Indeed, radon is responsible for up to 21,000 lung cancer deaths each year, and has been estimated to be responsible for 2,500 deaths per year in the UK8. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) lists indoor radon as one of the most serious environmental health problems in the United States, and the number one cause of lung cancer in non-smokers. About 2,900 non-smokers die from lung cancer caused by radon exposure each year in the U.S9 .
Because radon is invisible, odourless, and tasteless, regular testing is the only way to know if a home has a high concentration of radon10. In flats, it is most important to test units on the basement level where radon from the ground is likely to be highest, though tests should also be conducted on the first and second floors of any apartment complex11.
The Health Protection Agency (HPA) in the UK works with social landlords to carry out radon measurement and remediation (reduction) programmes. This helps landlords to comply with their duty of care and meet the requirements of the Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS)12. If high levels of radon are found, the social landlord determines the most appropriate remediation for the property. This could be in the following ways:
1 Comment
I wonder if the UK's recent ban on cigarette packaging has anything to do with World Cancer Day today. The link between cancer and our environment is very strong, and does deserve some attention. And while the link between cancer and smoking is well documented, what about cigarette packaging? Is a ban on cigarette packaging a worthwhile cause?
http://bit.ly/aN7oJC
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.