Shame he's not around to see it. Steve Rose reports on the posthumous Frank Lloyd Wright home that has the architect's fans up in arms. Guardian | Prev
Some very interesting comments regarding modern-day architectural practice. FLW is the designer and Thomas Heinz is the architect, for example. And the argument by the Foundation that they own the copywirght when it was actually owned by the original client - so did it then really pass into the next owner'shands when the piece of land was sold?
Overall I think it's a neat house, and I can be on board with the notion of it being for the most part an "authentic" Wright house. But better than Falling Water? Doesn't seem that way from the images shown here.
2 Comments
Some very interesting comments regarding modern-day architectural practice. FLW is the designer and Thomas Heinz is the architect, for example. And the argument by the Foundation that they own the copywirght when it was actually owned by the original client - so did it then really pass into the next owner'shands when the piece of land was sold?
Overall I think it's a neat house, and I can be on board with the notion of it being for the most part an "authentic" Wright house. But better than Falling Water? Doesn't seem that way from the images shown here.
i wonder is all of my best work will be built posthumously.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.