winning proposal is so sold out. after seeing the real thing in silverlake, this looks like a waste of energy and missed opportunity to build something new. i guess one can easily say 'no, this is different project'.
to select something that is a second issue says a lot about the jury too.
I think it's worth repeating a comment from h1 on the discussion thread linked above:
"Archinect should do a feature - not on the entries, since we're all going to see them anyway - but on the mechanics. Who are the nominators? who were the pre-finalists asked to submit portfolios? who reviewed them, etc. . . That would be more interesting than this blind speculation on who's going to win."
Mar 26, 07 10:58 am ·
·
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.
2 Comments
winning proposal is so sold out. after seeing the real thing in silverlake, this looks like a waste of energy and missed opportunity to build something new. i guess one can easily say 'no, this is different project'.
to select something that is a second issue says a lot about the jury too.
I think it's worth repeating a comment from h1 on the discussion thread linked above:
"Archinect should do a feature - not on the entries, since we're all going to see them anyway - but on the mechanics. Who are the nominators? who were the pre-finalists asked to submit portfolios? who reviewed them, etc. . . That would be more interesting than this blind speculation on who's going to win."
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.