Columbia University GSAPP (Jill)



Oct '06 - Feb '08

  • anchor


    By inhabitat
    Apr 14, '07 6:44 PM EST
    Mark Wigley, Columbia University Architecture, Volume Magazine, Columbia School of Architecture, Architecture Dean, Columbia Architecture

    My friend Geoff Manaugh (who is the editor of BLDGBLOG as well as a contributor to Archinect), recently published this fascinating interview of my / Columbia's dean Mark Wigley on BLDGBLOG. Anyone who is interested in Columbia's GSAPP program or who is interested in how sustainable design is addressed in academia should check it out >

    Below is a snippet of the section on sustainable design - the rest of the interview can be found on BLDGBLOG >

    BLDGBLOG: On an educational level, what role does sustainability play at Columbia?

    Wigley: What’s happening is sustainability now plays a huge role in the school at every level, because that’s where the students and the teachers are leaning. But what’s interesting – and this is where my own thoughts come in – is that nobody’s really interested in that word sustainability. That sounds like not ambitious enough. We do a lot of work that could be described as a search for more sustainable options – but, really, what it is is a search for a more radical ecological model. So the school’s not aiming toward sustainability, but aiming beyond that.

    If you had asked me the same question five years ago, I would have said it’s occupying 10% of our attention – whereas now it’s occupying, like, 35%. That’s not because the new generation of students wants architecture to follow the latest code on sustainability, but because they think it’s one of the most interesting philosophical and technical challenges to the architect. There’s the responsibility – and I think we’ve got a more responsible group of students and teachers coming along – but it’s also exciting to them. They find the whole concept exciting.

    Maybe five years ago, if you were for sustainability, you saw yourself as virtuous, and you saw yourself standing against radical avant-garde practices in architecture, which were, by definition, scandalously wasteful of resources. They neglected 99% of the human population and didn’t do anything good for anyone anywhere. But that’s not true anymore. A really radical ecological approach to architecture generates some of the most experimental avant-garde design. That old split between sustainability and being cool, so to speak – that’s gone. I think that’s a real difference between sustainability, as a defense against a relentless enemy, and sustainability as the opening up of a whole new series of potentials. And, of course, I love the latter. However, it may be that the former is more realistic. We’re not living in a good world. But I think it’s the job of architects to be optimistic, to invent new forms of optimism, to actually contaminate us all with the possibility that we could live differently.

    Read the full interview on BLDGBLOG >.


    • TED

      or if your an obsevant archinect reader, you could have seen the link in news on 12 Apr!

      architectural weaponry

      Apr 14, 07 11:58 pm

      Yeah yeah yeah "Architectural Weaponry" - I saw the link on Archinect news Thursday. However, I thought it was worth a repost on my Columbia GSAPP blog, because the interview is particularly relevant to us at Columbia, and to students who may be interested in Columbia.

      Apr 15, 07 12:10 am

      good point

      Apr 15, 07 3:33 am

      You made the right move, GSAPP Jill. One of my least favorite internet personalities is the type who loves to point out that your link could already be found elsewhere.

      Apr 15, 07 5:34 pm

      Block this user

      Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?

    • Back to Entry List...
  • ×Search in:

Affiliated with:

Authored by:

  • inhabitat

Other blogs affiliated with Columbia University:

Recent Entries