This presentation represents my attempt to rationalize the mesh by allowing it to grow based on specific programmatic and aesthetic inputs. The review took place on February 25th and it was then determined that I should leave the mesh behind and find a stronger way of rationalizing the program by the midterm which will take place on March 5th.
I agree that in the case of this project the mesh has been allowed to grow too liberally, but it has also raised quite a few questions in my mind.
Specifically, can the mesh ever truly become program?
Second, if the mesh becomes completely rationalized is it still a mesh?
Finally, is the mesh a valid pursuit in terms of generating "traditional" architecture?
Here are some slides from the presentation: