how can a structure so small be protected from any development int he centre of such a city? its principle view is, and has been for a very long time, across the river. nothing looks likely to affect that.
I can understand if UNESCO comments on development in an historic district, but is it really appropriate for such a large and distant body to comment on a city's planning policy around a single building? Are there critical view corridors being violated? - I thought it was St. Paul's dome that is London's famous skyline landmark.
Oct 22, 06 11:38 am ·
·
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.
2 Comments
how can a structure so small be protected from any development int he centre of such a city? its principle view is, and has been for a very long time, across the river. nothing looks likely to affect that.
I can understand if UNESCO comments on development in an historic district, but is it really appropriate for such a large and distant body to comment on a city's planning policy around a single building? Are there critical view corridors being violated? - I thought it was St. Paul's dome that is London's famous skyline landmark.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.