funny how ultimately this is a look-a-like protest ... though the architect is always talking about the form as a result of a set of ideas, they get sued for their form, not their ideas.
and anyway, is it really any different than an elvis or bette midler imposter? you dont see them getting sued.
or conversely, is there really an original to be an imposter of - isnt our profession an evolutive one? i mean you wouldnt sue your mother or your child for walking / talking / looking similarly to you.
ok, maybe i am simplifying too much, but again, just sue me. see you in court.
Aug 27, 05 10:38 pm ·
·
Just more examples of Reenactionary Architecturism.
Aug 28, 05 11:22 am ·
·
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.
2 Comments
funny how ultimately this is a look-a-like protest ... though the architect is always talking about the form as a result of a set of ideas, they get sued for their form, not their ideas.
and anyway, is it really any different than an elvis or bette midler imposter? you dont see them getting sued.
or conversely, is there really an original to be an imposter of - isnt our profession an evolutive one? i mean you wouldnt sue your mother or your child for walking / talking / looking similarly to you.
ok, maybe i am simplifying too much, but again, just sue me. see you in court.
Just more examples of Reenactionary Architecturism.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.