Archinect's Lexicon focuses on newly invented (or adopted) vocabulary within the architectural community. For this installment, we're featuring a term central to current conversations on how architects can use artificial intelligence in the design process.
"Generative design" is a technology-driven design process that employs algorithms and/or artificial intelligence (AI) to develop optimized design solutions. It represents an iterative design approach inspired by natural evolutionary processes, leveraging computing power to explore a large number of possible permutations of a solution, quickly and in real-time.
In the context of computer-aided design (CAD), a designer will input into the generative design software specific parameters such as material types, manufacturing methods, budget constraints, and performance criteria. The software then explores all possible permutations of a solution, testing and learning from each iteration what works and what doesn't.
Generative design can be used to design everything from products to buildings to systems. It has the potential to create incredibly efficient, sustainable, and innovative designs that may not have been conceived by a human mind, as it can explore many more design alternatives than a human could in the same amount of time.
This approach has gained prominence in fields like industrial design, architecture, and engineering because it not only increases efficiency but also allows for the development of designs that would otherwise be impossible or highly impractical to conceive by humans.
There are numerous examples of how architects have used generative design in their work. Here are a few:
This article is part of the Archinect In-Depth: Artificial Intelligence series.
1 Comment
There's an interesting article in the Washington Post about AI's hallucination problem. Basically they say that AI just "makes stuff up" which is the point, except they meant it in the bad sense. This is the part which keeps me at bay beyond giving up the best part of architecture, that being the act of creation. Why on earth would one want to give that up to a machine, I have no idea, but architecture is about emotion as much as logic so faking that is a non-starter.
https://www.washingtonpost.com...
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.