The review is about speculation as much as evaluation. Critics are not enemies, and they don’t know everything. Admitting a level of uncertainty that necessarily occurs within design education completely changes how one imagines the review moment. — sectioncut.com
6 Comments
Look at that group of sad losers, all wearing black, preparing to make 25k a year!
wow, what a good response!
I think it deserves a resounding Fuck Off!
maybe even two Fuck Offs out of a possible ten Fuck Offs.
Cheers, mate!
looks like Maoist China, but voluntary.
there are only two times when you wear black:
during your life as an architect, and at your funeral...
I think I've worked with the one with the pony-tail.
Sectioncut is cool, but this article seem very generalized. I found a lot of interesting ideas in reviews--isn't that what teaching is about? I only remember one particular asshole... maybe this is just what happens at bad architecture schools. It really depends on your reviewers--if they are respected practitioner you learn a lot, but if they write a theoretical blog/journal or tweet--red flag, red flag!
So, I guess when education becomes strictly for-profit, then the customer is always right. No more late nights, no more crits, your work is fine! Let's focus on what the reviewers are wearing rather than what they say... yah.
Yes, architects wear black. So do a lot of people. Anything else? Oh, yeah and there are a lot of male critics. Zzzzzz....
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.