I just love telling my gcs to redo work. My current battle are with improper sleeves. No, I will not alter the lobby design because you were too lazy to read my "sleeves not pass this line" instructions. Figure something else. Fill and recore at your expense if you need too.
I'm normally nicer but the second a Gc tries to sneak one past me, I turn to instant ashole.
Contractors still doing things based on 2004 ADA standards... Drives me nuts.
And people don't think we're necessary?
These acts are usually followed by, "We've always done it that way," or "That's how we've done it for years." Funny how those standards inconveniently get updated.
Tintt... why bother with milk in the first place? Coffee is best consumed in it's natural state, ie. black as death.
Back on the subject of contractors. I just rejected their applied firestopping details. City asked us to review what they did, and it turns out, it's not an acceptable system. Suck to be them. Tear it out & start over.
I used to drink it black. I've recently switched to espresso with ice and milk. No sugar. I add milk because I've decided it protects the teeth against stains! I want a coffee shop with service. When I am ordering a cup of coffee and am holding a bunch of stuff in my hands, I don't want to take the cup over to the condiment bar and take the lid off, find the milk, hope there is some in there, hope it is fresh, pour it in my cup and put the lid back on. Why do people do this and pay so much?
If I'm paying $5, they better be playing some obscure album I never heard before - something my mid-90s indie-snob self could have related to. The barista better behave and look like someone who just graduated from art school. The decor and patrons better fit into the stereotype of the hip/quirky urban neighborhood you're currently in (and ideally you're there at 11am on a Tuesday and these people seem like they have no job, yet lots of time and money). They better make the shit out of that coffee - they should have chemix pour-over as the only option for decaf, various cold-brew on tap with single-source origin listed on the pulls... The barista should be capable of recommending if you should add milk or not...
If they have none of this stuff, you're buying legal drugs from someone who knows they're the only game in town.
I enjoy lurking (and occasionally commenting) on Archinect forums, but I have to say, after that "Dear NCARB" thread i'm going to do a Miles and abstain until he who shall not be named is gone.
Unfortunately, that probably means I won't be visiting the site otherwise... I can grab the podcasts via my RSS feed, and the few other original articles the same way. Most everything else ends up on one of the other (Architzer, ArchDaily, ArchPaper) sites anyways. For me, the forums and discussion (including after articles and news) is a huge part of why I visit Archinect.... if that environment is toxic and non-productive, what is there to differentiate this place?
Amelia, Orhan, Paul, please fix this. This is a place to connect architects. Someone is actively undermining that function of the website and creating a toxic environment.
As much as I like this place, I hope other archinectors will join me in abstaining until this is resolved.
archanonymous, I was thinking the "If not an Architect, what else would you be?" was worse. I thought tammuz was kind of annoying but at least he could talk about architecture when he did. I find myself quite annoying sometimes as well and wouldn't care if half the shit I post is deleted (since much of it is intentionally nonsensical or provocation of some sort) Miles was negative quite often but again usually accurate and could talk about architecture in depth beyond what you find in books and other websties...
But Richard, Richard contributes ZERO, just intentionally false information or strange tirades on licensing etc....
maybe the goal is to let him clear house of the regulars many do not want around?
I agree with the above. I'd attempt restraint but I'm looking at a very busy next few weeks, if not months, so it may be hard to avoid the comic relief and warmth of the occasional dumpster fire.
The views are from Cascade Pass in the North Cascades National Park. This hike had been on my to-do list for over a year, and at 7.4 miles round-trip with 1800 feet of elevation gain, I wasn't sure if my fat ass could do it. Stuff like this reminds me why I moved out here, and now that I know I can do it, there's a whole laundry list of other hikes in the region that I want to tackle. So much better than staring into a computer screen and pumping Revit all day.
I briefly lived in Eugene a few lives ago during a period when I was between jobs, and spent most of my time scouting out various waterfalls in the area while recovering from NYC burnout for the first time.
When you get a chance, visit the Opal Creek Wilderness in Marion County and hike to Jawbone Flats through ancient old-growth forest alongside crystal-clear waters. That's where I first fell in love with the Pacific Northwest, and it will always be a special place to me. I did that hike again for the first time in 10+ years this past September while visiting from Cincinnati, and it was like coming home again.
Spent a week in August hiking around the Central Cascades with my ladyfriend. I'm tempted to go back forever. We're trying to do one more summit this year (probably Mt. Adams), and looking at Middle Sister next summer.
Jawbone Flats is an amazing area! Sadly it's insanely crowded these days (so is South Sister). I'm learning to live with the reality that witnessing that beauty means sharing it with the masses, but I still enjoy my solitude in nature. If anything, it's motivated me to get in better shape so I can get farther out in harder to find places.
^ Agreed. Nice thing about low-elevation hikes like Opal Creek is that if you don't mind dressing for the occasion, you can go there in November when it's in the 40s and drizzling and it's every bit as beautiful and you have the whole place to yourself.
Also, I'm in a frame of mind and situation in life where I'm ready to just burn everything the fuck down.......but! there are some things worth fighting for: the community on the Forums is one of those things.
"His plans call for a two-story building totaling about 2,200 square feet. Though not an architect, Slabaugh is designing the building himself. He also designed his home, at 6856 N. Keystone Ave., across from Sullivan’s Hardware."
Yes, from the looks of his home, which makes me slap my head and say "WTF?" every time I pass it, he is indeed not an architect.
He says in the article that his building is "unconventional!" and "eye-catching!" and this is all true. But it's not good. The proportions are terrible, any kind of overarching structural philosophy is non-existent, the stance is crooked...it's just bad.
can balkin's be banned now? he's shown evidence in his personal and "professional" life that he has no business being on here.
this guy is a creepy fuck with a fucked up life that doesn't need to be on a forum dedicated to architecture.
this is really a new low for archinect. that somehow it's okay to have someone dominate every thread with bullshit and now find out he's a violent misogynist.
In the future, when that house's ruins are the only thing left standing in that area, the next Vignola will come along with the ancient text in hand (discovered through combing the browser history of the last remaining hard drive, belonging to one Donna sink). Deciding that this particular building is of particular significance, the revived architectural order for the coming millennia will be based on the purity of "unconventionally terrible proportions."
I originally quit the forum a few years back b/c of a previous, Balkins-like wackjob who couldn't quit jizzing all over the forums back THEN. This problem comes back again and again and there should be something in the user agreement that specifically states that spamming/monopolizing threads or prolongued hounding/antagonizing of members destroys the forum community and will not be tolerated. The previous person that engaged in this behavior successfully, and permanently, changed the tone and nature of the forum community and I was not the only long-time member who fled. The forum still isn't the same as it was prior to that individual's "contributions". Because of the unique nature of TC, I bet you could actually read back through here and pinpoint the precise timeline of the decaying of the site due to the onslaught of one single individual.
However, the problem isn't just the one malignant member, but more damagingly it is others' responses to and engagement with the member. In fact, more than anything, it was the way others persisted in engaging the malignant member (knowingly, tauntingly, but unendingly) that ended up so thoroughly stifling other discussion that it became impossible to maintain forum momentum. People just stopped posting, b/c what was the point? It was going to devolve into a shit-flinging circus between the same few folks anyway.
It is not only these types of people that are harmful but our responses to them. I saw that happening again over the last few pages of TC and I nearly came on here to say I was wrong to come back and was leaving again, permanently. Seeing, now, that I'm not the only one who can't stand the constant baiting and arguing makes me feel like perhaps I can find a place in this community after all.
There are so few of us out in the world. Archinect has, in the past, been a beautiful place for me. Let's ALL try our best to keep it that way, and not blame one individual for everything but rather strive to be friendly and to be mindful of contributing to the community rather than potentially dividing it, or exacerbating damage with our own responses. Nobody at a dinner party would tolerate it long if two people started loudly haranguing each other. If you are one of those two then you are part of the problem.
I attempted to get my blog going again last year but stopped posting after a couple of new posts and it became clear to me that I wouldn't be able to have a discussion that didn't devolve into something all about Balkins. The general theme of the blog, the profession from an aspiring architect's viewpoint, is something that would have always attracted his attention and given him reason to feel like he should engage in the discussion and spread his twisted view of the profession he aspires(?) to. The discussion on my post on the intern title debate is a good example. http://archinect.com/arch-ellipsis/ncarb-punted-the-intern-title-debate
The thing is, looking back on that post and the comments, Balkins actually tried to stay on topic, but so much space and effort had to be devoted to correcting his skewed viewpoints, that the discussion ultimately lost its momentum and the discussion that should have happened, didn't. Ultimately, I write the blog as a way to help and encourage discussion about licensure, internships, finding jobs, etc. I decided that allowing Balkins to be a part of that did more harm than good. So I took a break from writing. It's really a shame because so much of the intern and licensure process has been changing recently. I wish I would have been posting about it.
Perhaps I should have taken a break from the forums as well. I know I've done my fair share of responding to and engaging Balkins. That's really all he wants anyway, someone to respond to him. It doesn't matter if it is just to call him an idiot ... he thrives on the attention.
If Archinect is looking at doing something soon, I'll stick around and start contributing with my blog again. If not, I think I'm going to leave altogether.
Some sort of code of conduct is pretty SOP for every other internet forum I've participated on, or at least the ones that have remained viable over time without getting overrun with trolls and spammers. Some boards have more heavy-handed mods than others and I appreciate Archinect's relatively laissez-faire approach to moderation, but there has to be some standard of acceptable behavior.
Yeah I'd say if you admit to stalking and threatening women such that the police get involved you probably shouldn't be on an architecture related forum. That's in reference to resident psycho Rick Balkins.
i think archinects fairly open policy towards posts is a real strength - a degree of off topic ranting gives it character and keeps it entertaining. but there does need to be a mechanism to limit the disruption when a person turns ranting into a crusade which kills incipient discussion and repels those of us who post only ocassionally after trying to read through a thread.
maybe something like a daily character limit / post count limit for people who post too much junk to let them get an a few words in and eventually redeem themselves but prevent overruns of vitriolic wordspiel.
that thread on how to find a good young architect cheered me up on a rough day. it's nice to remember there are intelligent curious people out there, and gratifying to see mature and sincere responses. i hope we dont scare them all away!
i don't think we have to have a codified set of rules to say "you broke this rule, therefore we have a right to ban you." i think archinect holds the right to ban whoever they want, with or without reason. if their community is suffering due to the actions of one member, i think they should exercise that right.
social norms are rules that are generally followed, yet generally not written out.
I felt the same about that young-architect thread. It gave me an opening to write something fresh and clean without fear that blahkins would interject.
Sep 7, 16 10:59 am ·
·
Yeah I'd say if you admit to stalking and threatening women such that the police get involved you probably shouldn't be on an architecture related forum. That's in reference to resident psycho Rick Balkins.
Why don't you stop posting statements that does nothing but just causes more anger.
First, I TOLD YOU THAT I DO NOT GO ABOUT STALKING women like you are saying. As for threatening, I'm not here to pander to other people. Maybe my "Take no bullshit... aggressiveness" can be threatening to the timid. The timid are always threatened by everything. You have to be aggressive to be taken seriously in an environment where people don't think of you as a person but as just a number. Aggressive.... but not violent. Aggressive.... not physical harming the other person.
If she thought I would be physically harming her... then... why didn't she call the UO Police within an hour of then or any other time she saw me.
When she did call the UO Police (which is also campus security), there had been zero communication from me. I had not talked to her during that day. There was no precipitating danger to her or anyone. I had not spoke to her in over a week to the day she sent UO Police. I did not threaten her life or physical well-being.
You just don't want to believe that because you like to believe the worse and you only want to distort the truth and facts into a story because you hate me. You hate me and we all know it. Guess what, I hate you, too!
Have a great trip Josh! I just spontaneously booked a flight to Edinburgh in a couple weeks... if I'm gonna be unemployed I might as well be funemployed.
Thread Central
I'm normally nicer but the second a Gc tries to sneak one past me, I turn to instant ashole.
TC, why, when I buy a $4.25 cup of coffee and ask for milk, why can't they put the milk in it for me? I love coffee but I hate coffee shops.
Contractors still doing things based on 2004 ADA standards... Drives me nuts.
And people don't think we're necessary?
These acts are usually followed by, "We've always done it that way," or "That's how we've done it for years." Funny how those standards inconveniently get updated.
Tintt... why bother with milk in the first place? Coffee is best consumed in it's natural state, ie. black as death.
Back on the subject of contractors. I just rejected their applied firestopping details. City asked us to review what they did, and it turns out, it's not an acceptable system. Suck to be them. Tear it out & start over.
Lots of cream, lots of sugar.
I used to drink it black. I've recently switched to espresso with ice and milk. No sugar. I add milk because I've decided it protects the teeth against stains! I want a coffee shop with service. When I am ordering a cup of coffee and am holding a bunch of stuff in my hands, I don't want to take the cup over to the condiment bar and take the lid off, find the milk, hope there is some in there, hope it is fresh, pour it in my cup and put the lid back on. Why do people do this and pay so much?
you pay $5 for the experience - not the coffee.
If I'm paying $5, they better be playing some obscure album I never heard before - something my mid-90s indie-snob self could have related to. The barista better behave and look like someone who just graduated from art school. The decor and patrons better fit into the stereotype of the hip/quirky urban neighborhood you're currently in (and ideally you're there at 11am on a Tuesday and these people seem like they have no job, yet lots of time and money). They better make the shit out of that coffee - they should have chemix pour-over as the only option for decaf, various cold-brew on tap with single-source origin listed on the pulls... The barista should be capable of recommending if you should add milk or not...
If they have none of this stuff, you're buying legal drugs from someone who knows they're the only game in town.
I never converted to a coffee drinker. My initial excuse was "I'm not that old." and now that I'm old enough "My life is not that depressing."
Switched from Red Bull to Coca-Cola recently.
I enjoy lurking (and occasionally commenting) on Archinect forums, but I have to say, after that "Dear NCARB" thread i'm going to do a Miles and abstain until he who shall not be named is gone.
Unfortunately, that probably means I won't be visiting the site otherwise... I can grab the podcasts via my RSS feed, and the few other original articles the same way. Most everything else ends up on one of the other (Architzer, ArchDaily, ArchPaper) sites anyways. For me, the forums and discussion (including after articles and news) is a huge part of why I visit Archinect.... if that environment is toxic and non-productive, what is there to differentiate this place?
Amelia, Orhan, Paul, please fix this. This is a place to connect architects. Someone is actively undermining that function of the website and creating a toxic environment.
As much as I like this place, I hope other archinectors will join me in abstaining until this is resolved.
archanonymous, I was thinking the "If not an Architect, what else would you be?" was worse. I thought tammuz was kind of annoying but at least he could talk about architecture when he did. I find myself quite annoying sometimes as well and wouldn't care if half the shit I post is deleted (since much of it is intentionally nonsensical or provocation of some sort) Miles was negative quite often but again usually accurate and could talk about architecture in depth beyond what you find in books and other websties...
But Richard, Richard contributes ZERO, just intentionally false information or strange tirades on licensing etc....
maybe the goal is to let him clear house of the regulars many do not want around?
Here's where I went yesterday:
Full photo album
The views are from Cascade Pass in the North Cascades National Park. This hike had been on my to-do list for over a year, and at 7.4 miles round-trip with 1800 feet of elevation gain, I wasn't sure if my fat ass could do it. Stuff like this reminds me why I moved out here, and now that I know I can do it, there's a whole laundry list of other hikes in the region that I want to tackle. So much better than staring into a computer screen and pumping Revit all day.
Way to rub it in, David...
Gorgeous!
Beautiful pics, David! You should check out Oregon sometime...
mountain porn. yes. and.not talking about dudes in pic.
tududs: South Sister, I presume?
I briefly lived in Eugene a few lives ago during a period when I was between jobs, and spent most of my time scouting out various waterfalls in the area while recovering from NYC burnout for the first time.
When you get a chance, visit the Opal Creek Wilderness in Marion County and hike to Jawbone Flats through ancient old-growth forest alongside crystal-clear waters. That's where I first fell in love with the Pacific Northwest, and it will always be a special place to me. I did that hike again for the first time in 10+ years this past September while visiting from Cincinnati, and it was like coming home again.
Bingo!
Spent a week in August hiking around the Central Cascades with my ladyfriend. I'm tempted to go back forever. We're trying to do one more summit this year (probably Mt. Adams), and looking at Middle Sister next summer.
Jawbone Flats is an amazing area! Sadly it's insanely crowded these days (so is South Sister). I'm learning to live with the reality that witnessing that beauty means sharing it with the masses, but I still enjoy my solitude in nature. If anything, it's motivated me to get in better shape so I can get farther out in harder to find places.
^ Agreed. Nice thing about low-elevation hikes like Opal Creek is that if you don't mind dressing for the occasion, you can go there in November when it's in the 40s and drizzling and it's every bit as beautiful and you have the whole place to yourself.
archanonymous, hang on a bit longer. Your comment as to why Richard is a problem is very well-stated. It may be taken to heart.
Also, I'm in a frame of mind and situation in life where I'm ready to just burn everything the fuck down.......but! there are some things worth fighting for: the community on the Forums is one of those things.
Keep hanging in there.
Donna - I feel you on that sentiment. I'm thinking big changes are needed. Things aren't feeling right with me right now.
At least it's only two weeks until my Norway/Iceland trip!
Same here. I feel like moving out to the Pacific Northwest was a huge step in the right direction for me, but more changes need to take place.
^ At first, I went "Huh? What's Quondam smoking this morning?", then I went "Well damn if that doesn't make a lot of sense."
"crime" as in what did balkins do wrong in a codified manner? or was that comment not related to the current balkins situation?
"His plans call for a two-story building totaling about 2,200 square feet. Though not an architect, Slabaugh is designing the building himself. He also designed his home, at 6856 N. Keystone Ave., across from Sullivan’s Hardware."
Yes, from the looks of his home, which makes me slap my head and say "WTF?" every time I pass it, he is indeed not an architect.
Buzz's girlfriend - Woof.
I just Google Streetviewed that thing and wish I hadn't.
Josh, use the street view time machine to see the trees and previous house from a few years back.
He says in the article that his building is "unconventional!" and "eye-catching!" and this is all true. But it's not good. The proportions are terrible, any kind of overarching structural philosophy is non-existent, the stance is crooked...it's just bad.
RE: NCARB thread:
can balkin's be banned now? he's shown evidence in his personal and "professional" life that he has no business being on here.
this guy is a creepy fuck with a fucked up life that doesn't need to be on a forum dedicated to architecture.
this is really a new low for archinect. that somehow it's okay to have someone dominate every thread with bullshit and now find out he's a violent misogynist.
My main issue is the proportions. If those were done correctly, I wouldn't have an issue with it.
The other issue is the massive asphalt patch that rings around the trees.
No, jla-x, I point out how shitty DS+R's work is all the time, too.
Deciding that this particular building is of particular significance, the revived architectural order
is Millenialism taken?
I originally quit the forum a few years back b/c of a previous, Balkins-like wackjob who couldn't quit jizzing all over the forums back THEN. This problem comes back again and again and there should be something in the user agreement that specifically states that spamming/monopolizing threads or prolongued hounding/antagonizing of members destroys the forum community and will not be tolerated. The previous person that engaged in this behavior successfully, and permanently, changed the tone and nature of the forum community and I was not the only long-time member who fled. The forum still isn't the same as it was prior to that individual's "contributions". Because of the unique nature of TC, I bet you could actually read back through here and pinpoint the precise timeline of the decaying of the site due to the onslaught of one single individual.
However, the problem isn't just the one malignant member, but more damagingly it is others' responses to and engagement with the member. In fact, more than anything, it was the way others persisted in engaging the malignant member (knowingly, tauntingly, but unendingly) that ended up so thoroughly stifling other discussion that it became impossible to maintain forum momentum. People just stopped posting, b/c what was the point? It was going to devolve into a shit-flinging circus between the same few folks anyway.
It is not only these types of people that are harmful but our responses to them. I saw that happening again over the last few pages of TC and I nearly came on here to say I was wrong to come back and was leaving again, permanently. Seeing, now, that I'm not the only one who can't stand the constant baiting and arguing makes me feel like perhaps I can find a place in this community after all.
There are so few of us out in the world. Archinect has, in the past, been a beautiful place for me. Let's ALL try our best to keep it that way, and not blame one individual for everything but rather strive to be friendly and to be mindful of contributing to the community rather than potentially dividing it, or exacerbating damage with our own responses. Nobody at a dinner party would tolerate it long if two people started loudly haranguing each other. If you are one of those two then you are part of the problem.
@tinnt have to agree with Non, black is best. Where was that Corvus? I like Novo which doesn't seem too snooty. But I do love my pour-over.
Also @Olaf can't believe that is an upcoming show on Fox... Seems like something for Adult Swim not Fox.
Hit TC!
Good points Manta.
ah... black coffee from my french press... hard to beat, esp at 4:30am.
I attempted to get my blog going again last year but stopped posting after a couple of new posts and it became clear to me that I wouldn't be able to have a discussion that didn't devolve into something all about Balkins. The general theme of the blog, the profession from an aspiring architect's viewpoint, is something that would have always attracted his attention and given him reason to feel like he should engage in the discussion and spread his twisted view of the profession he aspires(?) to. The discussion on my post on the intern title debate is a good example. http://archinect.com/arch-ellipsis/ncarb-punted-the-intern-title-debate
The thing is, looking back on that post and the comments, Balkins actually tried to stay on topic, but so much space and effort had to be devoted to correcting his skewed viewpoints, that the discussion ultimately lost its momentum and the discussion that should have happened, didn't. Ultimately, I write the blog as a way to help and encourage discussion about licensure, internships, finding jobs, etc. I decided that allowing Balkins to be a part of that did more harm than good. So I took a break from writing. It's really a shame because so much of the intern and licensure process has been changing recently. I wish I would have been posting about it.
Perhaps I should have taken a break from the forums as well. I know I've done my fair share of responding to and engaging Balkins. That's really all he wants anyway, someone to respond to him. It doesn't matter if it is just to call him an idiot ... he thrives on the attention.
If Archinect is looking at doing something soon, I'll stick around and start contributing with my blog again. If not, I think I'm going to leave altogether.
Well, there should BE a user agreement, how about that.
Some sort of code of conduct is pretty SOP for every other internet forum I've participated on, or at least the ones that have remained viable over time without getting overrun with trolls and spammers. Some boards have more heavy-handed mods than others and I appreciate Archinect's relatively laissez-faire approach to moderation, but there has to be some standard of acceptable behavior.
i think archinects fairly open policy towards posts is a real strength - a degree of off topic ranting gives it character and keeps it entertaining. but there does need to be a mechanism to limit the disruption when a person turns ranting into a crusade which kills incipient discussion and repels those of us who post only ocassionally after trying to read through a thread.
maybe something like a daily character limit / post count limit for people who post too much junk to let them get an a few words in and eventually redeem themselves but prevent overruns of vitriolic wordspiel.
that thread on how to find a good young architect cheered me up on a rough day. it's nice to remember there are intelligent curious people out there, and gratifying to see mature and sincere responses. i hope we dont scare them all away!
i don't think we have to have a codified set of rules to say "you broke this rule, therefore we have a right to ban you." i think archinect holds the right to ban whoever they want, with or without reason. if their community is suffering due to the actions of one member, i think they should exercise that right.
social norms are rules that are generally followed, yet generally not written out.
^midlander
I felt the same about that young-architect thread. It gave me an opening to write something fresh and clean without fear that blahkins would interject.
Yeah I'd say if you admit to stalking and threatening women such that the police get involved you probably shouldn't be on an architecture related forum. That's in reference to resident psycho Rick Balkins.
Why don't you stop posting statements that does nothing but just causes more anger.
First, I TOLD YOU THAT I DO NOT GO ABOUT STALKING women like you are saying. As for threatening, I'm not here to pander to other people. Maybe my "Take no bullshit... aggressiveness" can be threatening to the timid. The timid are always threatened by everything. You have to be aggressive to be taken seriously in an environment where people don't think of you as a person but as just a number. Aggressive.... but not violent. Aggressive.... not physical harming the other person.
If she thought I would be physically harming her... then... why didn't she call the UO Police within an hour of then or any other time she saw me.
When she did call the UO Police (which is also campus security), there had been zero communication from me. I had not talked to her during that day. There was no precipitating danger to her or anyone. I had not spoke to her in over a week to the day she sent UO Police. I did not threaten her life or physical well-being.
You just don't want to believe that because you like to believe the worse and you only want to distort the truth and facts into a story because you hate me. You hate me and we all know it. Guess what, I hate you, too!
Anyway, I leave for Norway in less than two weeks and I'm very excited. I might have to get some shots to rival some of David's mountain pictures.
Josh,
Have a enjoyable and safe trip when you do and safe return.
Can someone please find the police report?
Eh, I don't care enough to.
Have a great trip Josh! I just spontaneously booked a flight to Edinburgh in a couple weeks... if I'm gonna be unemployed I might as well be funemployed.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.