Fair enough, Continuum. I'll accept 'toxic' if you'll accept 'lazy.'
Feb 15, 21 7:44 pm ·
·
Continuum
I am trying, sir, but can't locate a definitive reasoning to one or the other without more context to the question. Thank you anyway!
Feb 15, 21 7:48 pm ·
·
citizen
Okay, I looked at some of your other question threads and see that you sometimes provide a bit of context or show some initial investigation on your part. That's a fair way to ask questions. This thread, however, starts with a wide-open question and no evidence of other effort-- my response was to that.
Now, I just Googled a term in your question and in less than a second the stuff below popped up. Why don't you start in Google instead of Archinect? After you learn a bit, you can bring a more informed question to this place-- you'll get better feedback and less blowback.
Easement Question - Bridge or Fence?
If there is a natural gas line easement on your property, does it make more sense to build a bridge over it or to create a fence around it?
Hire an architect. Stop looking for free online advice.
just cut it with a blowtorch...
there’s no easement like quantitative easement
more sense for what?
c) tunnel
If Train A leaves Boston heading south at 60 mph and Train B heads north from Miami at 70 mph, how many golfers does it take to change a light bulb?
Gophers?
Both. Build a fence around it, and build a bridge over it. Anything less and you're just making problems for yourself later.
don't forget to spec galvanized skyhooks for that bridge
If you don't have sky hooks, you're just a poser.
.
Answer to at least half the questions on the ARE!
Does it come in periwinkle?
Didn't realize how toxic Archinect had become since years ago!
Not toxic at all. Just not into doing other people’s homework. Big difference.
Fair enough, Continuum. I'll accept 'toxic' if you'll accept 'lazy.'
I am trying, sir, but can't locate a definitive reasoning to one or the other without more context to the question. Thank you anyway!
Okay, I looked at some of your other question threads and see that you sometimes provide a bit of context or show some initial investigation on your part. That's a fair way to ask questions. This thread, however, starts with a wide-open question and no evidence of other effort-- my response was to that.
Now, I just Googled a term in your question and in less than a second the stuff below popped up. Why don't you start in Google instead of Archinect? After you learn a bit, you can bring a more informed question to this place-- you'll get better feedback and less blowback.
are architects licensed to design bridges, or fences?
it's a trick question, like the majority of them.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.