Lewis Mumford wrote that, in a city, “time becomes visible.” Not, it would appear, in Raleigh, North Carolina, where a city board has just decided that a rather discreet and understated modern house might need to be torn down because it damages the ambience of a historic district, which is to say it destroys the illusion that the neighborhood is a place in which time has stopped. — Vanity Fair
A battle of bureaucracy and "historic preservation" is playing out in a Raleigh, NC neighborhood. Louis Cherry, FAIA, is building his own home in the Oakwood neighborhood of Raleigh. After having received approval for his design by relevant city agencies, including the Raleigh Historic Development Commission who oversees the Oakwood Historic District, construction proceeded in the vacant lot Cherry purchased. Gail Wiesner, his neighbor, has since led a charge to halt its construction filing an appeal with the local Board of Adjustment, who oversee procedure of local public agencies. Voting 3-2, the board found that the RHDC's decision had “no rational basis” and the Building Permit was rescinded.
12 Comments
relavent
If aesthetics are the issue, Cherry's license should be revoked. FAIA - really?
I've been following this for awhile and this whole story makes me sick to my stomach. Some busybody neighbor - whose house is only a few years old AND is ugly crap - decides she's in charge of the neighborhood and wants to force everyone to follow her taste. In the process she forced the neighborhood to pick sides, thus destroying the sense of community she thinks her ugly house upholds. The landowners who followed the law now see their very expensive investment at risk. It's despicable.
I donated to the legal fund mentioned in the article, and I follow the house on twitter (unofficial twitter feed, very funny).
We don't have historic districts - despite being one of the oldest communities in the US. Instead we have Architectural Review Boards, populated by housewives and busybodies. It's a conflict of interest to have a professional (architect or builder) on the board.
Overly rich owners just do whatever they want and have their layers sort it out later. The penalty for demolishing a 200 year old house without a permit? $100.
Only in the South, haha , Hope that home gets completed,and that neighbor Gail has to see it for the rest of her life.
If your going to build in a historic district, you should probably look into the local regulations, but whatever the particular history here, I'm always amazed that the municipality dosen't back up the home owners. When doing an addition in an historic DC neighborhood, they want you to be sympathetic but not immitative. That's what this house looks like to me.
Welcome to the South, you can have all the guns you want but your housing choices are limited to Georgian, Victorian and Tudor, please enjoy your so called freedom.
All foreign styles, no less.
Real Estate brokers can sit on the ARB.
Apparently they were approved by the city and historic pres committee and met all conditions to get a bldg permit , until the neighbor complained about the aesthetics
Can't blame him for that. But subverting the process over a whiny neighbor is par for the course. I say let the lawyers sort it out, with the loser paying the winner's legal fees.
Not sure why you think this is "only in the south." I grew up in the south, and have lived in New York City for 8 years. NIMBY's are much worse up here. The also have more power, and they affect much more prominent buildings.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.