Blair Kamin, author and Pulitzer Prize-winning architecture critic for the Chicago Tribune, has announced that after 33 years, and nearly three decades in the role of the critic, he is leaving the paper.
Kamin published this Twitter thread on Friday, January 8:
1/7 After 33 years at Chicago Tribune, 28 as architecture critic, I’m taking a buyout + leaving the newspaper. It’s been an honor to cover + critique designs in the first city of American architecture + to continue the tradition begun by Paul Gapp, my Pulitzer-winning predecessor
— Blair Kamin (@BlairKamin) January 8, 2021
After 33 years at Chicago Tribune, 28 as architecture critic, I’m taking a buyout + leaving the newspaper. It’s been an honor to cover + critique designs in the first city of American architecture + to continue the tradition begun by Paul Gapp, my Pulitzer-winning predecessor.
During these 28 years, I have chronicled an astonishing time of change, both in Chicago and around the world. From the horrors of 9/11 to the joy of Millennium Park, and from Frank Gehry to Jeanne Gang, I have never lacked for gripping subject matter.
Whether or not you agreed with what I wrote was never the point. My aim was to open your eyes to, and raise your expectations for, the inescapable art of architecture, which does more than any other art to shape how we live.
So I treated buildings not simply as architectural objects or technological marvels, but also as vessels of human possibility. Above all, my role was to serve as a watchdog, unafraid to bark and, if necessary, bite, before developers and architects wreaked havoc on the city I am deeply grateful to my newspaper, which has never asked me to pull punches. I have been incredibly fortunate to work with talented editors, reporters, photographers and graphic designers. They have been a huge help. Journalism, like architecture, is a team enterprise.
What will I do next? I have no idea. After decades of stressful deadlines and rewriting paragraphs in my head at midnight, I’m ready for an extended break -- and many long bike rides along Chicago’s lakefront.
It’s essential that a new critic, with a fresh set of ideas, take up where Paul Gapp and I left off. Imagine Chicago without a full-time architecture critic. Schlock developers and hack architects would welcome the lack of scrutiny.
Over the years, Archinect has referenced numerous Kamin Tribune pieces here in the news and also had the pleasure of welcoming him as a guest on the Archinect Sessions podcast, episode 86: A Friend in Deed: Chicago Tribune architecture critic Blair Kamin discusses his rocky relationship with Donald Trump.
1 Comment
Schlock developers and hack architects would welcome the lack of scrutiny.
The decline of architecture criticism is by design. Philip Johnson is enemy number one, though he mentored Ada Louise Huxtable who put popular arch criticism into existence. Now most people have no idea who even Frank Lloyd Wright is. Why step down, when you can keep and outsource your job via a grant from the Ford Foundation (NYTimes)?
If there is a new idea in criticism, it should be to add context and design expertise to the popular discussion, especially the conflicts arising around historical issues that are many times oversimplified for cynical and selfish reasons. Not to fall into the extreme of craft myopia or the extreme of social justice myopia. You think the New Deal was great, until you find out Hitler used it as a template and many of the programs failed because they forgot about design. You think modernism came from Europe, until you realize it originated in America post civil war. The kind of informed design history we won't get because the next generation of sociopathic Ivy League elites want to distract you.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.