Zoo workers withdrew the birds from Berthold Lubetkin’s 1934 Penguin Pool after it was claimed the concrete was causing them a bacterial infection known as “bumblefoot”. His daughter Sasha said it was “terribly sad” to see her father’s design sitting unused in the zoo. “Perhaps it’s time to blow it to smithereens.” — Evening Standard
As a truly rare example of architecture at a non-human scale, Berthold Lubetkin’s 1934 Penguin Pool at London Zoo is a Modernist classic. But it has been disused for several years, given the fact that its concrete ramps were giving the penguins a bacterial infection known as “bumblefoot.”
Since the penguins have moved to a larger and more accommodating enclosure, the original penguin pool has been quietly crumbling in an abandoned section of the zoo.
Should the original Penguin Pool be restored for historical value, or should it exist only as images of an impossible penguin utopia?
3 Comments
I'd love to see the sculptural form reconstituted into something else. It's absolutely graceful. That said, I think live animal zoos should be left behind in the 20th century.
I'm sure a new use could be found for this wonderful piece of architecture. Would make for an interesting competition.
Pretty interesting thin slab cantilever, amazing that it has survived this long.
Wikipedia says the penguin pool was demolished in 1979.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.