what is it that makes architecture schools so different, so unappealing?

What's the name of your school?

"Detail is much appreciated."

Doing my project for me is much appreciated.

what makes your architecture school lack-luster?

lack of NAAB accredidation
leads to rapid antiquation

thanks for the feedback so far

A school that has a March program without a Barch program thus forceing its students to acquire an March makes a school less than it aught to be for the sake of appearances. Superficial status.

A year and a half into my MA and I would have to say studio professors who have never built or worked at a firm that actually builds. Lots of articles, book mentions theories and and proposals but no experience or understanding of what it takes to produce for an employer.

Would you like me to write your thesis as well?

thank you for your feed back!! this is awesome!

Okay, admittedly, my sarcastic comment deserved an equally as sarcastic response, but the poorly written, unresearched email was uncalled for.

- Has to be accredited by the NAAB
- No faculty problems
- Sense of direction
- Sense of uniqueness and identity
- Up-to-date with the profession outside of academics
- Up-to-date with technological advancements
- Quality of faculty