i ran a quick structural analysis on the images, and no, no they're not structural.

I'm guessing they at least act as a diaphragm for stiffness.

i suggest calling the architect and asking them. people are always willing to talk about their work.

Freq_arch- if the panels are removed to allow more glazing, would this comprimise the structure? Could they be reinforced, by fastening them to the floor plates or retro fitting them with another type of web to allow more light in?

Vado- The firm no longer exists and no leads on the current location of the members of the firm.

Punky_B- It's amazing how you can run an indepth analysis of a structural system like this from the photo. If you look around you will find this type of system lends to 40'+ of clear space on the interior and all that load has to go to something. Not to mention these type of building are a greener and more effecient way to build.

http://www.hearstcorp.com/tower/
http://www.arcspace.com/architects/calatrava/torso2/torso2.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burj_al-Arab
http://www.hugg.com/story/12855/


Thanks for the feedback.

Can't help you ith structure, but I think it's a really cool-looking building.

I'll gander 99.99999% of people would disagree. Good for you working with it!

Seattle thinks its one of the ugliest buldings in the city. Most county officials want it torn down.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_County_Administration_Building

So they should say that OMA (Rem Koolhaas) Seattle library is about the same. -I know that comment is a stretch.

I think the building has it's merits and definitely the buildings structure is making a resurgence. This could be one of those buildings that was just too far ahead of its time.