Archinect
anchor

Metropolis article on the architect/developer

snarkitect

A few people have mentioned an article in Metropolis (possibly a few months ago?) about architects as developers. I've been looking in vain and haven't found it anywhere; can someone tell me which issue it's in?

 
Mar 2, 05 12:40 pm
garywg

Metropolis [Decemeber 2004] - Architect: How to find a perfect developer

Mar 2, 05 1:24 pm  · 
 · 
snarkitect

Thank you!

Mar 2, 05 1:40 pm  · 
 · 
MikeArchNY

I hope you don't mind me posting it here so that veryone can read it:

Architects: How to Find the Perfect Developer -- Hire Yourself!
Originally published in Metropolis magazine
December 2004

So you're an architect who has grown frustrated at having brilliant plans turn out as mediocre buildings. Maybe you've worked with developers who think contemporary design doesn't move enough product. Perhaps a few too many contractors have dumbed-down your inspired palette of materials under the pretense of "value engineering." Or maybe you're just tired of always building buildings for somebody else. Have you ever considered becoming a developer of your own architectural projects? Metropolis has tapped the expertise of five architects who have done just that. With a few easy lessons from these pioneers, you too can become master of your design domain.

Lesson 1: It's Never Too Early to Start, or: Don't Be Afraid to Empty Your Own Dumpster

Three years ago, 25-year-old Portland architectural intern Kevin Cavenaugh was getting discouraged trying to work his way up the ladder of a large firm. "I realized that even if an ideal client arrived to hire us, I wouldn't be the shoulder that got tapped to work on the project," he recalls.

Then, Cavenaugh got an influential pep talk from his wife. "She said to me, 'How much harder is it for you to do what your clients do? You should just hire yourself.'" Cavenaugh soon began sending lunch invites to some of the developers he'd sat across the conference table from at work. "I'd say, 'What's a pro forma? What does cap rate mean?' I think they thought it was kind of cute."

Before long, Cavenaugh had taken out a loan, procured a site, and begun construction on a three-story mixed-use building with retail below and housing above. At just $107 a square foot, the palette was rough: concrete floors, sheetrock, and garage-like rollup glass doors. But Cavenaugh used this to his advantage, designing with a poetic simplicity that earned critical praise and attracted what would become the city's hottest wine bar.

When the contractor's budget came in too high, Cavenaugh spotted an $8,000 line item for hauling off debris as a way to cut costs. I said, 'I'll do that,'" he laughs. "At first the contractor said, 'No, you can't.' And I said, 'This is almost not going to be a project. If you want it to be a project, I'm going to do that.' So I had an old beat up Chevy truck, and every Friday I'd cruise over and fill it up with all the debris."

Today Cavenaugh has gone on to design and build a second mixed-use project that won top honors at last year's AIA/Portland design awards, earning praise for simultaneously promoting high-density development and doing it with affordable elegance. A third and forth project are in early design. Who says youth is wasted on the young?

Lesson 2: Modern Design Sells-Just Don't Go Crazy

Chad Oppenheim is another up-and-coming architect who has leapfrogged his peers by complementing design skills with a development role. But whereas Cavenaugh focuses on small self-funded boutique projects, Oppenheim recently designed and developed a 50-story tower called Ten Museum Park that has helped revitalize downtown Miami. "We sold for prices that were considered high for Miami Beach, and this was a run-down neighborhood," Oppenheim says. "Everyone was shocked." Now developers are imitating his projects.

But the reason South Floridians were willing to move off the beach into Ten Museum Park couldn't be copied: Oppenheim's design-think Richard Meier with a touch of Arquitectonica, his former employer. Despite modernism's long history in Miami, developers thought faux-Mediterranean historicism would sell better. Oppenheim proved them wrong. "You try to operate on the furthest edge of the spectrum, where the design is pushed as far as it can be without jeopardizing profit," he explains. "And it's proven true repeatedly that the extra design time and consideration for creating beautiful lifestyles pays off."

But be careful your design isn't compromised. In San Francisco, for example, architect Nilus De Matran last year completed two live-work units of a simple, crisp style that ultimately netted the first-time developer a handsome profit-but only after he fought for the integrity of his design. De Matran, a friend and disciple of Zaha Hadid, found that when it came time to sell, realtors wanted to paint his pristine white interior wild colors and stock it with gaudy furniture as a mockup to potential buyers who couldn't use their imagination viewing an empty space. "I was like, 'No way!'" he recalls. "When you've got a property sitting on a market and you're waiting for a buyer to come, it'd be easy to think they're right. But I had to listen to my instincts."

Lesson 3: No Hablo Archispeak

For years during the late 1990s, the four principals heading acclaimed New York architecture firm Sharples, Holden, Pasquarelli (better known as SHoP) had talked about developing a project of their own. "Having your own money at risk buys a lot of credibility," SHoP's Gregg Pasquarelli explains. "If you have new design ideas and methods, you should share in the risk, but you should share in the reward."

Back in late summer of 2001, the architects lined up a bold project: conversion of a warehouse in downtown Manhattan's Meat Packing District (before the hookers moved out and most of the trendsetters moved in) into condominiums that would also include a four-story addition cantilevered over an existing building. But just one month before SHoP and co-developer Jeff Brown (who helped the architects learn the building game from the client's side) needed to decide conclusively about whether to risk their life savings on the project, two jet planes crashed into the World Trade Center. "There was so much uncertainty and none of the lenders wanted to make any decisions," Pasquarelli recalls. "New York was still on fire."

So when they went calling for a loan, relying on the standard building trade language of clerestories and cornices, escrow and equity, just wouldn't do. Pasquarelli and company needed to share their vision. "We believed not only in the neighborhood and the design, but that New York City was going to bounce back," the architect explains. "But most bankers are not in the business they're in because of their visionary or creative abilities." It takes extra effort, he says, "to get people to understand what you're trying to do when it's not cookie-cutter."

In other words, like movies or other collaborative art forms, architecture requires communication skills to make your case for the funds that will foster your unique projects. Too often, Pasquarelli and his fellow architect-developers agree, architects are bogged down in "archispeak," industry jargon that confuses outsiders, or at least doesn't inspire them.

"You have to spend a lot of time trying to explain what you're trying to do, especially if it's more unconventional," Pasquarelli says. "You have to be able to communicate in ways that are not elitist and explain well the kinds of complexities of a project and what difference design can mean in resolving them."

So whether it's joining a cheesy public speaking club like Toastmasters or practicing discourse with the family, even the best designers will find that the chance to make their brick-and-mortar dreams a reality is enhanced by their ability to communicate their vision. Oh, and while you're at it, when the time comes to deliver your best sermon to that banker, it wouldn't hurt to give that all-black outfit a rest for one day.

Lesson 4: Know Thy Materials

During a recent telephone interview, San Diego architect and developer Jonathan Segal was driving to a wood supplier to purchase 4-by-10 beams for use in a skylight on his current project. "I can quote you anything about a building's cost," Segal says. "And I think most architects wouldn't know half of that."

This is a lesson architects would be well served to learn regardless of whether they're developing buildings. Tired of battling the client and contractor when your designs are abridged to cut costs? Then know the value of each material choice before you select it, and be ready to defend its value in tangible terms.

What's more, that knowledge can make the building process more cost effective. Segal has designed nearly twenty different projects in San Diego, from the sleek geometric Waterfront building in Little Italy to the stunning new cube-like Titan lofts in San Diego's East Village, and he says a key to maintaining his streak of profitable projects with refined contemporary architectural form is often just eliminating needlessly wasted time.

"I was going through some old files the other day and came across a project where the contractor walked off the job," Segal recalls. "There were three five-inch-thick binders full of requests for information on the drawings. Now, doing my own projects, I'm on the site and if someone says, 'What do I do here?' I say, 'Do this, this, and this,' and we move on. It's not three days of going back and forth."

That said, an architect-developer need not be a cheapskate about materials, either. "On the contrary," Pasquarelli adds, "I think by understanding the bottom line, you can actually spend more to make a better building. It can increase the overall budget but increases it in a way that increases value."

Lesson 5: Real Estate for Dummies

By now you've no doubt noticed the architect-developers cited here have almost exclusively built residential projects, with or without ground-floor retail added to the mix. The reason is there's a multi-year social shift happening in America: people (especially empty-nest baby boomers) are returning to inner cities by the millions, and many are giving up their houses in favor of condominiums, lofts, and apartments. The reason Oppenheim, Cavenaugh, De Matran, Segal, and Pasquarelli have been successful not just from a design perspective but also financially is that they've paid attention to both macro and micro-economic trends. If that sounds appallingly un-sexy for an architect, keep in mind that this knowledge allowed them to get their buildings built-and they're a lot nicer than what would have been put up by most of their traditional building-industry peers.

Despite the continuing demand for multi-unit housing, there are other opportunities to be found. Maybe there's a former industrial area now full of artists that in a couple years will be ready for a few restaurants and a few hip companies. Or perhaps there's a centrally located inner-city neighborhood poised for revitalization with live-work spaces. It's not just a matter of choosing a building type, but identifying what kind of architecture there's a need for in each city, neighborhood, or even block.

Like learning to swim, the hardest part, Segal says, is just to dive in: "People tell me it's too scary to develop your own projects. And I say, 'What you're doing is scarier to me. You're running a business. You've got a bunch of employees to worry about, clients calling you seven days a week. I think it's easier to do what I do."

Lesson 6: You'll Be a Better Architect

Business types like to talk about the bottom line, so here it is: for all the risk and uncertainty that accompanies developing your own projects, those who have done it say they're more sensitive, imaginative designers for having controlled the process themselves. There is more room for experimentation (Don't like that wall? Tear it down!), they argue, and better monitoring of a design's execution in brick and mortar.

"We were the toughest clients we've ever had," Pasquarelli says. "You're really critical with yourself that every thing you're doing is the best use of limited funds. "But that's really when the value of architecture becomes interesting. You're able to forecast and model the relationships between zoning, design, and financial return and have that as a kind of fluid dynamic equation that you can be completely conversant with at both ends of the spectrum. You can solve problems with good design."

Mar 2, 05 2:02 pm  · 
 · 
ArchAngel

Great Article..it's been my dream to dump this day job and BUILD....

Mar 2, 05 2:38 pm  · 
 · 
Bula

Very inspiring…thanks for posting mjotter.

Mar 2, 05 4:24 pm  · 
 · 

Block this user


Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?

Archinect


This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.

  • ×Search in: