I am trying to compare all of these schools for graduate school, in a M.Arch II program. I was leaning heavily towards VT, however have some concerns about all of the hand drawing and lack of computer student work I have seen even though computer program classes are required in their curriculum. Just wondering any more insight into these programs, I have researched very extensively and really just wanting opinions to help me decide.
UO - Portland campus. Trimesters.
VT - WAAC. Computer Concern. Favorite otherwise.
TAMU - Currently attend for undergrad. Would be cheapest, but concerned about having all the studio professors already.
Clemson - Like the people, have a lot of friends who attend. Good school, but another state school in a small town.
UO vs VT vs Clemson vs TAMU - M.Arch2
I am trying to compare all of these schools for graduate school, in a M.Arch II program. I was leaning heavily towards VT, however have some concerns about all of the hand drawing and lack of computer student work I have seen even though computer program classes are required in their curriculum. Just wondering any more insight into these programs, I have researched very extensively and really just wanting opinions to help me decide.
UO - Portland campus. Trimesters.
VT - WAAC. Computer Concern. Favorite otherwise.
TAMU - Currently attend for undergrad. Would be cheapest, but concerned about having all the studio professors already.
Clemson - Like the people, have a lot of friends who attend. Good school, but another state school in a small town.
Still waiting to hear back from UMich and Rice
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.