15 of the most high profile buildings that some hack journalist that knows nothing about architecture or urbanism thinks are ugly.
Feb 21, 17 12:02 pm ·
·
TIQM
Curbed readers voted on this list.
Feb 21, 17 12:16 pm ·
·
senjohnblutarsky
They were given a list to vote on. Chigurh's comment still stands due to the list. If we were actually talking about the real "ugliest buildings"
, I'm sure none of these would be on the list.
Feb 21, 17 12:22 pm ·
·
TIQM
I don't see that they were given a list to vote on. Maybe I'm missing it. Here is what the blog post said: "What do you think are the city’s ugliest buildings? New, old, tall, squat—as long as it’s within the five boroughs, it’s fair game."
Feb 21, 17 12:32 pm ·
·
chigurh
how about the duane reade with feces on the windows.
Feb 21, 17 1:22 pm ·
·
senjohnblutarsky
There was definitely a list given. People are lazy. Nearly every single building they mentioned in the article showed up on the final list. It's really a miracle all of them didn't.
Feb 21, 17 2:01 pm ·
·
TIQM
Well.. There was a very short list of suggested buildings. I count six suggestions, of which three showed up on the list of 15.
I agree with Curbed - I think that 432 Park Avenue is a blight on the neighborhood. I think it's inelegant and blocky, and it's too tall. In my opinion it's ruined the Midtown skyline.
ha! ruined the midtown skyline....like that is some gem to be preserved. Welcome to development. I don't even understand how it could be a blight on the neighborhood, the footprint is one block, if that, and the height doesn't even matter when you are standing on ground level. A bunch of rich people go up into their units and disappear. Manhattan is a playground for the rich if you don't have the money to pay to play, move to Jersey.
Nothing really, but I don't have anything against it. Seems to be a run of the mill modernist tower. Height is a non-issue, because it being the tallest in Manhattan will only be temporary, as the "tallest" is the most ephemeral title. You oppose development and I am against that, NIMBYS suck. I get it, a high profile tower for the rich is an easy thing to attack, but is it really one of the worst buildings? No.
Feb 21, 17 1:28 pm ·
·
TIQM
I'm not opposed to development. I'm opposed to ugly, blocky buildings that are out of scale with the neighborhood.
I don't agree entirely with this list, at least five are not ugly IMHO. Including the Trump tower, and I am no fan of Trump. But it definitely does not belong on this list where some of these buildings are pure garbage.
15 of NYC's Ugliest Buildings
http://ny.curbed.com/maps/ugliest-buildings-nyc
If these are the ugliest, then NYC's got it pretty good. I gotta think there are far worse...
:)
I've always had a soft spot for the Pan-Am building...
And I'm not saying that these are good-looking, only that there must be uglier ones in a city that size.
I think it's more a kind of list of failed buildings (by high-profile architects) that didn't deliver on an urban scale than per se being ugly.
I like 432 Park Ave and think it is far more elegant than the ugly disfunctioned trash can it drew inspiration from.
15 of the most high profile buildings that some hack journalist that knows nothing about architecture or urbanism thinks are ugly.
Curbed readers voted on this list.
They were given a list to vote on. Chigurh's comment still stands due to the list. If we were actually talking about the real "ugliest buildings" , I'm sure none of these would be on the list.
I don't see that they were given a list to vote on. Maybe I'm missing it. Here is what the blog post said: "What do you think are the city’s ugliest buildings? New, old, tall, squat—as long as it’s within the five boroughs, it’s fair game."
how about the duane reade with feces on the windows.
There was definitely a list given. People are lazy. Nearly every single building they mentioned in the article showed up on the final list. It's really a miracle all of them didn't.
Well.. There was a very short list of suggested buildings. I count six suggestions, of which three showed up on the list of 15.
I agree with Curbed - I think that 432 Park Avenue is a blight on the neighborhood. I think it's inelegant and blocky, and it's too tall. In my opinion it's ruined the Midtown skyline.
And don't get me started on Pan-Am...
ha! ruined the midtown skyline....like that is some gem to be preserved. Welcome to development. I don't even understand how it could be a blight on the neighborhood, the footprint is one block, if that, and the height doesn't even matter when you are standing on ground level. A bunch of rich people go up into their units and disappear. Manhattan is a playground for the rich if you don't have the money to pay to play, move to Jersey.
I think it is a gem to be preserved. The view south from the park is really inspiring and important. And 432 Park sticks out like a sore thumb.
What do you like about it?
Nothing really, but I don't have anything against it. Seems to be a run of the mill modernist tower. Height is a non-issue, because it being the tallest in Manhattan will only be temporary, as the "tallest" is the most ephemeral title. You oppose development and I am against that, NIMBYS suck. I get it, a high profile tower for the rich is an easy thing to attack, but is it really one of the worst buildings? No.
I'm not opposed to development. I'm opposed to ugly, blocky buildings that are out of scale with the neighborhood.
yea, well, that's just like, your opinion man.
Of course it is. :)
Surprised the Via by BIG isn't on that list. I suppose people do like that shit.
I think that's one of his better buildings. Maybe one of his last great buildings.
I'm surprised that David Adjaye's Sugar Hill Building wasn't on the list:
http://archinect.com/news/article/88063915/david-adjaye-s-sugar-hill-building-sparks-controversy
Really? You're surprised? Do you think Curbed knows how to get to Sugar Hill, let alone, get Sugar Hill?
That building is great! The offset, the sawtooth, the daylight from multiple angles and the public program/design.
http://store.frameweb.com/frame-publishers-mark-53.html
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.8303745,-73.9415529,3a,75y,83.31h,104.75t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s_mmL1Wdj3v3eLQ7O1gewxQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
I still like this building.
the Eiffel tower was Ugly! The one in Paris, not Las Vegas
completely agree
I don't agree entirely with this list, at least five are not ugly IMHO. Including the Trump tower, and I am no fan of Trump. But it definitely does not belong on this list where some of these buildings are pure garbage.
new york's walmarts
list is little not true there exsist more ugliest building what is not in list and on list have some really cool buildings..
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.