I would like to make some architectural / art related researches on this topic I am not able to define. white, minimal, pure, sometimes clinical... These images will tell you more than my own words. If you have any other reference, essay, book, thought or whatever could help me define this I would be very grateful.
I hope my english is not too bad p.s. I am a student in Fine Arts who makes short movies.
why does white = pure? its something people just made up at some point. you should use you brain and challenge that notion. its too easy to photo white spaces...
Depends on context. I do car dealerships. A trend I like is this white canvas building. The vehicles, the displays, etc. become the focus.
So here's the new Ferrari standard...
Or others. Saab, Bentley, Porsche, Rolls, etc. are all going for that blank canvas look. Works well in retail where the product and display is what brings the room to life.
In all seriousness though, wouldn't something like minimalist concrete buildings be more "pure" ??? I'm not one to think that buildings need to be materially honest, but I think that would align more with the "purity" argument than color. At least in architecture.
Even from a standpoint of color I think it could be argued that white is only one approach to purity in architecture. I mean, think of cars, what color cars look the dirtiest? White, because while the color itself is "pure" it shows off dirt more than other colors. I think in that sense you could argue that painting a space grey would be more functionally pure than painting it white.
More importantly, I think the argument is missing elements beyond color/materiality. Are we ignoring form and details?
^good point, but that actually depends on locale. If you are in a location that accumulates lighter color sediments on things then yes, black cars are worse. If you are in an area that accumulates darker sediments it's white cars. I live in LA and there is an eternal and unavoidable black dust that collects on everything, my white car is dirty the same day I wash it.
The point that white is not inherently more pure from a functional sense is still applicable in my mind, unless you wish to argue that white is the "least" dirty color.
Mar 30, 15 1:58 pm ·
·
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.
pureness in architecture
Dear all,
I would like to make some architectural / art related researches on this topic I am not able to define.
white, minimal, pure, sometimes clinical...
These images will tell you more than my own words.
If you have any other reference, essay, book, thought or whatever could help me define this I would be very grateful.
I hope my english is not too bad
p.s. I am a student in Fine Arts who makes short movies.
pureness = sterile. okay!
Richard Balkins Sir
all of your posts should be so
succinct or Haiku
Doug Wheeler's installation at Venice's Palazzo Grassi might interest you.
So purity only has to do with color? That seems like a questionable conclusion.
why does white = pure? its something people just made up at some point. you should use you brain and challenge that notion. its too easy to photo white spaces...
pureness is boring
Depends on context. I do car dealerships. A trend I like is this white canvas building. The vehicles, the displays, etc. become the focus.
So here's the new Ferrari standard...
Or others. Saab, Bentley, Porsche, Rolls, etc. are all going for that blank canvas look. Works well in retail where the product and display is what brings the room to life.
But those Ferraris are messing up the pureness!
In all seriousness though, wouldn't something like minimalist concrete buildings be more "pure" ??? I'm not one to think that buildings need to be materially honest, but I think that would align more with the "purity" argument than color. At least in architecture.
Even from a standpoint of color I think it could be argued that white is only one approach to purity in architecture. I mean, think of cars, what color cars look the dirtiest? White, because while the color itself is "pure" it shows off dirt more than other colors. I think in that sense you could argue that painting a space grey would be more functionally pure than painting it white.
More importantly, I think the argument is missing elements beyond color/materiality. Are we ignoring form and details?
Remember what that guy said about ornament.
Considering your focus on white, you might also enjoy Kenya Hara's book, WHITE.
^good point, but that actually depends on locale. If you are in a location that accumulates lighter color sediments on things then yes, black cars are worse. If you are in an area that accumulates darker sediments it's white cars. I live in LA and there is an eternal and unavoidable black dust that collects on everything, my white car is dirty the same day I wash it.
The point that white is not inherently more pure from a functional sense is still applicable in my mind, unless you wish to argue that white is the "least" dirty color.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.