Take the jump to read the rest of editor Bernd Upmeyer's description of issue #10...
How such Holy Urbanism can be produced is explained by Daniel Hadley, for example, through the City Creek Center in Salt Lake City that quite clearly defies the dichotomy between market and temple cities, in his article “A Mormon Megaproject”. Thus, the City Creek Center is designed to be a centre of consumerism and economic production, whose purpose, nevertheless, is to ensure vitality in front of the nearby Temple Square. Sacred and commercial spaces seem increasingly to coalesce and create a kind of Foucaultian Heterotopia, an environment that is capable of juxtaposing in a single real place several spaces and several sites that are in themselves incompatible, as Colin Davies points out in his contribution “The Sacred and the Holy: Transient Urban Spaces”. Peter Dorsey in his piece “Strata and Sound: The Adhan as an Urban Operating Procedure” argues that contemporary Holy Urbanism is flourishing especially at places where religion is creating a hybrid together with capitalism. As an example he mentions the Lakewood Church Central Campus in Houston, Texas that can seat more than 16.000 worshipers, adapting efficiently into a spectacle-based environment by satisfying multiple consumer appetites simultaneously. In the Nigerian city of Lagos the hybridisation processes of religion and the market have even transformed the urban space itself into a battlefield, in a free market where religion is a commodity to sell and an urban survival strategy, as Emeka Udemba concludes in his “God is a Nigerian”. Within such a capitalistic realm, religious buildings follow an increasingly territorial logic that is similar to capitalistic corporations or franchises such as McDonald’s or Starbucks. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, for example, standardized the design of their temples and thus created a generic network of identical buildings that are spread out - Starbucks-like - all over the planet, as Jesse LeCavalier illustrates in his article “The Mormon Church’s Infrastructure of Salvation”. Carolyn Sponza, in her contribution “Drive-Through-Religion”, even states that in the United States, planning a church and a shopping mall always begins with the same capitalistic question – how much parking the site can accommodate. Such an attitude leads in a lot of cases to the design of big box, Ikea-like, building types that are perfectly located along a suburban highway. But religious big boxes nevertheless - though convenient and visible - force visitors to seek them out, park their cars, and walk toward their front doors. And if you don’t think it’s for you, you can keep driving along the highway until the next big box containing another religion grabs your attention. Such Holy Urbanism promotes religious choice and makes multi-religious spaces possible that are flexible as pieces of fashion, as empty spaces for inter-religious dialogue that incarnate the belief in a multi-faith society and allow for openness, and heterogeneity as Karen Crequer reveals in her piece “Sacred Beauties”.
MONU MAGAZINE
2 Comments
Everything about this article is all wrong! Comparing Capitalism to Religion (especially Christianity) is like comparing apples to oranges. Christians don't congregate in "Big Box" churches to blend into the capitalistic economy of consumerism, it is merely using a resource available to the church that is inexpensive to build, so that the church can use that money to help others! It's not even about the actual building, it's about the people inside. There is no "standardization" tactic like placing Starbucks all over the country. And providing enough parking for congregants is also not some capitalistic tactic, how ridiculous! Christians dont drive around up and down the highway looking for the best church to satisfy some consumerist desire. Everything about this article could only appeal to the non-believer to give them more reason to scorn at those who do believe. If one were to actually compare the church to economics, I believe it more closely relates to socialism...people give to the church to benefit EVERYONE, not just a few individuals or just for the pastor. It's about giving to those in need! If there is such thing as "Holy Urbanism" it certainly isn't this.
Hello. Just for the record, the text above is not actually an article but merely a description of a magazine and its contents. The contributors to the publication have, I think, done their best to focus on the economic and urban dimensions of religious practices through responsibly researched and solidly reasoned articles. The goal of the publication is not to compare religion to economy but rather to investigate the complex relationships between the two and the spatial impacts they have.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.