is there really a middle ground choice in dealing with global warming? now the silent majority of scientists are speaking out and publicizing alternatives to the extreme panic of the environmentalists doomsdayers.
Many in this camp seek a policy of reducing vulnerability to all climate extremes while building public support for a sustained shift to nonpolluting energy sources.
statistical nuances are leading towards a wait and see approach - but can we really afford to wait?
“This is a mega-ethical challenge,” said Jerry D. Mahlman, a climatologist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., who has studied global warming for more than three decades. “In space, it’s the size of a planet, and in time, it has scales far broader than what we go-go Homo sapiens are accustomed to dealing with.” NYT
1 Comment
mentioned in the article is a good source of information. the tyndall did much of the ground work for the stern report.
we are in crisis.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.