The original rationale for the open-plan office, aside from saving space and money, was to foster communication among workers, the better to coax them to collaborate and innovate. But it turned out that too much communication sometimes had the opposite effect: a loss of privacy, plus the urgent desire to throttle one’s neighbor. — New York Times
5 Comments
wait, wasn't there literally an article just a few months ago in NYT titled New Office Designs, Room to Roam and to Think about new trends in office designs ft work like Seattle offices of Russell Investment, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation headquarters by NBBJ (and their own office) where there’s "not a private office or cubicle anywhere, and there’s constant low-level hubbub"
I do work in one of those, sometimes I think my head will explode. If I am on conference call I have to cover my second ear, so I can hear whats on another end of the phone. It decreases productivity, rather then creates something. instead of open communication all I hear now is how others are frustrated with their computer problems. yes thereir is more social interaction, but do not see how projects benefit from it. Now they just yell from their seats if they have question regarding project they are working on and do not really care if I am focused on another one.
Nam - I've posted comments about these problems for a while now around here. See my comment on that other news item, and on Lian's blog about the GSD's newish desks in the trays. People HATE working like this - open office is not set up for "collaboration" - the only thing it's good for is surveillance by the top predator - oops - management .
here's Lian's follow up to her other post.
open/closed. you need some of each. why is this so hard?!
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.