The Bush administration identified Friday more than 300,000 acres of national forest, including about 85,000 acres in California, that could be sold to pay for services in rural areas across the country. sfgate
thanks everyone who voted for W - you get what you pay for i guess! i guess i should look at it this way - more jobs for architects to put housing in those nasty little tree ridden forest[anyone really know a nice squirrel?]. thanks george!
if we didnt have iraq -- just think -- we could pay for services in rural areas, have forest and perhaps keep social security aflot!!
2 Comments
thanks everyone who voted for W - you get what you pay for i guess! i guess i should look at it this way - more jobs for architects to put housing in those nasty little tree ridden forest[anyone really know a nice squirrel?]. thanks george!
if we didnt have iraq -- just think -- we could pay for services in rural areas, have forest and perhaps keep social security aflot!!
it use to be;
"give this useless land to indians"
now
"sell this expensive land to developer friends, cheap"
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.