Archinect
anchor

got to 'love' the donor...

outed

i'm sure a few of you will see this today, but sounds like 4 firms in south carolina just got the shaft...

In a move that's been called unprecedented, USC canceled all bids to hire an architect for its new $90 million Moore School of Business so a donor could pick a design firm of her own choosing.
While no state spending rules were broken, four Columbia firms and their national partners spent months of labor and an estimated $100,000 each hoping to win the project before the school abruptly canceled the bids in a two-sentence memo sent April 2.
Instead, the business school's private foundation will pay an estimated $4 million or more to a New York firm chosen by the school's benefactor, Darla Moore.
Moore, a Lake City financier for whom the school is named, sits on the foundation board. The firm chosen, Raphael Vinoly Architects, was a finalist for the contract but was not going to win it, a source close to the bidding told The State newspaper.
The architect's fee will be a gift from the foundation, which is allowed under state procurement rules, according to the S.C. Budget & Control Board.
But the head of the S.C. chapter of the American Institute of Architects called the last-minute canceling of the bids "unprecedented."
And one frequent critic of the university called it "an end run around the procurement process."
"People shouldn't deal with the university if they don't play by the rules," said Ashley Landess, president of the S.C. Policy Council.
If private money is mingled with public money, the project should have to follow public rules, Landess said.
"There will be public money involved in this project," she said. "And a lot comes from other government sources. It's a symptom of a bigger problem: the university blurring the line between private and public money."
Moore, among the school's biggest donors, declined comment through a USC spokeswoman.
A member of the USC Board of Trustees, Moore's donations to the business school - $45 million in 2004 and $25 million in 1998 - are the largest ever made to the school. Together, university officials said in 2004, the two donations constituted the largest private gift by a single donor to a U.S. business school.
In July, USC announced a $30 million match to Moore's 2004 gift.
A portion of those donations is going to build the new business school building on Greene Street near Colonial Life Arena in Columbia's Vista. It is expected to provide a much-needed boost for the USC's Innovista research campus, which has had construction and tenant recruitment struggles.
Former Gov. Jim Hodges, president of the business school's private foundation, said the foundation considered Moore's request to chose the building's architect reasonable.
"It's pretty straightforward from my standpoint," he said. "She gave $60 million for a world-class, iconic building that will bear her name. So we thought her request was pretty modest."
Hodges wouldn't comment on whether the process of choosing a firm was fair, saying he was not privy to it.
"I was just involved in the solution part of this," he said.
As for how the architectural bids compared, USC said it would not release details of the bidding process because "the deliberations of the selection committee are confidential," spokeswoman Margaret Lamb said.
"Canceling (bids) in general is not unusual," she added.
But Adrienne Montare, president of the South Carolina chapter of the American Institute of Architects, said the architects expected one of them to receive the contract at the end of the day if they played by the rules.
"In the history of the AIA, it is a rare event that a project is advertised and that our members go though the process of trying to get shortlisted and to have that pulled from the public process," she said "I'm not sure there is a precedent in the state."
Montare said that while project bids have been canceled in the past because of funding problems, it is highly unusual for a project to be abandoned because of a donor's wishes.
She estimated the firms would have spent about $100,000 each preparing their proposals.
"It can be very, very expensive," she said. "And it's all done in hopes that you will be short-listed and the state procurement process will be adhered to."
Montare is married to Tom Savory, a principal in Watson Tate Savory, one of the firms vying for the project. She also once worked at the firm.
Michael Watson, another principal at Watson Tate Savory, declined comment last week.
The other local firms competing for the contract were LS3P Associates, The Boudreaux Group and the Garvin Design Group.
Boudreaux Group president Heather Mitchell said, "I agree that it is unprecedented." She wouldn't comment further.
Mary Beth Sims Branham, vice president and managing principle of LS3P, said: "This is the first time I have been involved with a process that was canceled.
"We do a lot of work with the university," she added, "and I don't know if I should comment on what is fair or what's not fair. They have to do what's right for the university. Hopefully, next time we might be selected."
Efforts to reach officials of the Garvin Design Group were unsuccessful last week.
The firm negotiating to design the school, Rafael Vinoly, is world-renowned and was one of the finalists in the World Trade Center design competition. Among its most notable projects are the Cleveland Museum of Art and the Tokyo International Forum, an exhibition and concert hall and conference center.
Lamb noted that the firm also designed the University of Chicago's Graduate School of Business.
Efforts to reach Vinoly project manager David Roland were unsuccessful last week.
The Vinoly firm was partnering with Columbia architects Stevens & Wilkinson on its bid for the business school work.
Ashby Gressette, president of Stevens & Wilkinson, said he had not been notified that the foundation was negotiating with Vinoly.



now, some of you may be saying "but vinoly is such a better choice design wise." - how would you know?

this stinks all the way around....

 
Apr 12, 10 11:54 am

the firms preparing their proposals were acting in good faith, expecting the university would do the same. so much for good faith. sounds like there is no remorse - or even really any concern - among the university officials.

stinks, but no lessons will be learned here. these firms cannot afford to no longer do business with usc. they'll regret the loss and move on.

the worst things is that - if there truly was an investment at the level of $100k per firm - it's not unlikely that the loss will mean either layoffs from those firms or the release of temporary folks that they enlisted to prepare their proposals.

but, then, this would have happened at the 3 unsuccessful firms anyway.

Apr 12, 10 12:04 pm  · 
 · 
won and done williams

that's what you get for doing work without a contract...

while unethical on the part of the university, to me it points to fundamental flaws in the ways architects conduct business.

Apr 12, 10 12:05 pm  · 
 · 

Wow, what a shitty situation.

I mean I certainly think it's fair for a major donor to decide who will design the building that bears his/her name, but to stop the process midway through is really questionable.

Yes, we (not to mention contractors) always put out money for proposals and it is always a risk, but how miserable to put $100K into something then get a 2-line email saying "Oh, we changed our mind. Forget it."

Apr 12, 10 12:06 pm  · 
 · 
el jeffe

she started donating money towards the project in 2004 - and we're to believe that only now she realizes she'd like to (or can) select the architect?
please.

Apr 12, 10 12:47 pm  · 
 · 
Justin Ather Maud

When everybody trying to sleep,

I'm somewhere making my midnight creep.

Every morning the rooster crow,

something tell me I got to go

I am a back door man

Apr 12, 10 4:27 pm  · 
 · 
l3wis

/shrug

can't argue with 60 million, guys

Apr 12, 10 11:21 pm  · 
 · 
copper_top

no, you can't argue with the privileges that $60 million buys her, but we can certainly argue with how it was handled. That privilege should have been demanded/established BEFORE the three firms started work.

Apr 12, 10 11:58 pm  · 
 · 

Block this user


Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?

Archinect


This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.

  • ×Search in: