Is it not your job to know this? If not, ask the client to hire someone more competent who does not crowd-source basic code questions. Also worth noting, codes vary greatly across cities/states/countries/etc... Your question is so vague and ignorant that's it's more sad than comical.
To the OP, listen to poop. There is a joke in here somewhere . . .
Nov 10, 22 10:38 am ·
·
Non Sequitur
^really? occupancy count for plumbing fixtures assumes 50/50 M/F ratio unless you really have a specific need not too. Our code typically favours slightly higher fixture reqs for F washrooms in public occupancies so it's usually like 3m for 4f... never seen a situation that would allow 6m-3f .
Nov 10, 22 10:39 am ·
·
poop876
code minimum or requirement vs. what client wants or needs is a little different! As long as you meet the code requirement, you can go more. In addition the code does allow the distribution of sexes to be other than 50%. So yeah, it would be legal to have different fixture counts for M/F.
To be fair you're both correct depending on the occupancy. If you're in an A occupancy then you need more fixtures for female occupants. Everything else is a 50/50 split between the genders.
Toilet for LGBT and Universal toilet is the same?
Toilet for LGBT and Universal toilet is the same?
If similar why LGBT need unisex/ all gender toilet?
Maybe? Could you try and rephrase in a more confusing way?
could you clarify what you're asking? uses for an accessible toilet stall with a single water closet and lav?
like this
Is it not your job to know this? If not, ask the client to hire someone more competent who does not crowd-source basic code questions. Also worth noting, codes vary greatly across cities/states/countries/etc... Your question is so vague and ignorant that's it's more sad than comical.
Also, 6 plumbing fixtures for men vs 3 for women? In what fucked-up country is this even legal?
Non, it would be legal in the U.S.
To the OP, listen to poop. There is a joke in here somewhere . . .
^really? occupancy count for plumbing fixtures assumes 50/50 M/F ratio unless you really have a specific need not too. Our code typically favours slightly higher fixture reqs for F washrooms in public occupancies so it's usually like 3m for 4f... never seen a situation that would allow 6m-3f .
code minimum or requirement vs. what client wants or needs is a little different! As long as you meet the code requirement, you can go more. In addition the code does allow the distribution of sexes to be other than 50%. So yeah, it would be legal to have different fixture counts for M/F.
To be fair you're both correct depending on the occupancy. If you're in an A occupancy then you need more fixtures for female occupants. Everything else is a 50/50 split between the genders.
.
50 different genders require 50 different toilets.
Let a hundred toilets bloom!
Gender and toilets: both constructs. Volunteer and opinions: both dumb.
What about fractional genders?
eww, blooming toilets
as a lover of the free market, you should be salivating at all of the options provided
Just one big open pit. Array the perimeter of 'the pit' with foot pedestals and grab bars. Gender neutral and eco friendly.
I'm from Alberta so I want Freedom Toilets
Are those like Freedom Fries?
Its where Freedom fries end up
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.