These are not representations in the medium of paint. Van Gogh has nothing to do with this. In terms of quality it's like comparing the pyramids of Dhoser and Khufu. Further, I find MAD's embrace of the purely synthetic resulting in something far more organic and harmonious with its context and time than Snohetta's pavilion simultaneously nostalgic and obscene intrusion into the landscape. (95% serious)
Sep 27, 16 8:51 pm ·
·
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.
mad shit
what up with mad's opera interior wood shit?
what kind of wood that be and why it dont be more common?
(Although most likely a hardwood cnc'd to create the shape and attached to a substructure)
^i love the scale of the wood in that building, so nice.
I dunno m8. the rain deer pavilion looks amateurish to me or at least more arts and craftsy. The MAD project looks super clean and precise
we talking about this?
vs
?
The resolution on MAD's certainly seems higher more detailed/fine...
I can paint a higher resolution picture than Van Gogh, doesn't make it better or worse.
These are not representations in the medium of paint. Van Gogh has nothing to do with this. In terms of quality it's like comparing the pyramids of Dhoser and Khufu. Further, I find MAD's embrace of the purely synthetic resulting in something far more organic and harmonious with its context and time than Snohetta's pavilion simultaneously nostalgic and obscene intrusion into the landscape. (95% serious)
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.