I had my crit on monday..panel was Philip Bay, Chan Yew Lih and Ruzica..
i'm not really sure how to classify the crit.. the main points of contention was why it was such an inward-looking space and Philip insisted that the elderly wants to be outdoors although i argued that air-conditioning helps them to keep the changes in temperature and humidity under control . My design ws based on the idea that by default, its air-conditioning but you'll have the option of opening the sliding doors and let the space be naturally ventilated and also the option of working at the cafe(with the wireless network connection). But as all crits go, there was never a conclusive answer.
The second point was the expression of the rear facade towards Duxton Plain Park. Programmatically, all the residences and offices had little decks and opened up towards the park. The intention for this link between the interior space and the park to be linked was there but..the tutors felt that it wasnt expressed very well. Good thing, i had a little diagram on my panels to explain my intentions but the end decision was that it just wasnt expressed architecturally enough.
Last but not least was the closing comments of Philip.. he felt my building was boring. he told me that i'm competent but needs to push myself to do something more exciting. Incidentally, he was also on my crit panel for the previous project and also coincidentally, both the projects had a square form and similar spatial organisation techniques. For that, he 'challenges' me to either break away from the box or make a more interesting box and develop the skill to add the social dimension to my architecture.
so now, i'll wait for any personal comments from my tutor and also my design grade.