Very interesting post that pertains to architecture firms, even though it was written about computer programmers. I found that I hated managerial meetings when I was in big offices, because I was usually in a "maker" role and it completely interrupted my workday.
Paul Graham:
I find one meeting can sometimes affect a whole day. A meeting commonly blows at least half a day, by breaking up a morning or afternoon. But in addition there's sometimes a cascading effect. If I know the afternoon is going to be broken up, I'm slightly less likely to start something ambitious in the morning. I know this may sound oversensitive, but if you're a maker, think of your own case. Don't your spirits rise at the thought of having an entire day free to work, with no appointments at all? Well, that means your spirits are correspondingly depressed when you don't. And ambitious projects are by definition close to the limits of your capacity. A small decrease in morale is enough to kill them off.
* * *
When we were working on our own startup, back in the 90s, I evolved another trick for partitioning the day. I used to program from dinner till about 3 am every day, because at night no one could interrupt me. Then I'd sleep till about 11 am, and come in and work until dinner on what I called "business stuff." I never thought of it in these terms, but in effect I had two workdays each day, one on the manager's schedule and one on the maker's.
totally right about the manager/maker time conflict. maybe i need to print this out for the managing partners of my office. i'm supposed to be running the design/production side of things in our office but i'm constantly pulled into hr, billing, marketing, and other (in my mind) non-productive activities.
Jul 31, 09 7:27 am ·
·
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.
Maker's Schedule, Manager's Schedule
Very interesting post that pertains to architecture firms, even though it was written about computer programmers. I found that I hated managerial meetings when I was in big offices, because I was usually in a "maker" role and it completely interrupted my workday.
Paul Graham:
I find one meeting can sometimes affect a whole day. A meeting commonly blows at least half a day, by breaking up a morning or afternoon. But in addition there's sometimes a cascading effect. If I know the afternoon is going to be broken up, I'm slightly less likely to start something ambitious in the morning. I know this may sound oversensitive, but if you're a maker, think of your own case. Don't your spirits rise at the thought of having an entire day free to work, with no appointments at all? Well, that means your spirits are correspondingly depressed when you don't. And ambitious projects are by definition close to the limits of your capacity. A small decrease in morale is enough to kill them off.
* * *
When we were working on our own startup, back in the 90s, I evolved another trick for partitioning the day. I used to program from dinner till about 3 am every day, because at night no one could interrupt me. Then I'd sleep till about 11 am, and come in and work until dinner on what I called "business stuff." I never thought of it in these terms, but in effect I had two workdays each day, one on the manager's schedule and one on the maker's.
Maker's Schedule, Manager's Schedule
This website has some very good essays, thanks!
i'll have to dig deeper. that guy is on it.
totally right about the manager/maker time conflict. maybe i need to print this out for the managing partners of my office. i'm supposed to be running the design/production side of things in our office but i'm constantly pulled into hr, billing, marketing, and other (in my mind) non-productive activities.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.