Alright, I've looked through http://www.livescience.com/technology/destroy_earth_mp-1.html and it seems most of them cannot be accomplished during my lifetime; however #6 and #2 apparently can. However, I would like to look at a bunch of different suggestions to complete as fast as possible with the highest possible probability that it would actually get through. Please post links, your own theories, etc. Also, don't forget, the more the better, so if you're in on this send me a PM and I'll tell you what to do next. I'm posting this from a web cafe so my identity isn't compromised. I recommend you spread this message on other forums, billboards, ads, etc. with complete anonymity as well. Thanks and good luck!
My theory is:
if we all spread this stupid message to all other forums, billboards, ads etc. the computers will explode because of the stupid content of these comments and theories, therefore the earth will blow up.
Aw that was poppy but fun. Strangelets! Some are more tongue in cheek than others, but Im especially dubious of 6. Youd have to what, change the basic parameters of probability for the universe?
Why are we trying to destroy it again? I thought I was trying to save it. Although I'm not doing much of anything right now except writing emails and posting on Web forums.
I had a dream about grey goo once. There was just this island city of heaped up techno salvage on a rocky outcrop from fallen sea levels, surrounded by a beach like glacier crags of ejected inert matter left in successive tides consumption like a sore in the midst of a vast glistening dark grey sea all crusty and crumpled on the shore like like metalic creme brulle.
^ Namely, Luke Kakizaki, the jap with the stereotypical one-inch dick.
I've been working with Mel and she's a pretty nice gal. We currently consist of a team of 10 or so highly-trained professionals.
The ultimate goal of our group is the destruction of humanity. It is in our belief that the ultimate meaning of existence involves destruction of what existed, and that humans, which exist like any other atom, must also be destroyed. But this doesn't mean just waiting until Nature does it for us. We can't be couch potatoes about this. The meaning of life not only to destroy what existed, but to do so as fast as possible. It's too bad most people are blind to this -- that's why we're here.
It seems at the moment that the method that would have the highest guarantee of total extinction of humanity would be destruction of the Earth. We have thought about just using a lot of h-nukes, among other methods, but realized that there would be a higher probability of remaining humans after execution of the plan. Furthermore, destruction of the earth would be like hitting two birds with one stone, in light of the meaning of life.
Aug 5, 09 4:40 am ·
·
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.
Suggestions on destroying earth
Alright, I've looked through http://www.livescience.com/technology/destroy_earth_mp-1.html and it seems most of them cannot be accomplished during my lifetime; however #6 and #2 apparently can. However, I would like to look at a bunch of different suggestions to complete as fast as possible with the highest possible probability that it would actually get through. Please post links, your own theories, etc. Also, don't forget, the more the better, so if you're in on this send me a PM and I'll tell you what to do next. I'm posting this from a web cafe so my identity isn't compromised. I recommend you spread this message on other forums, billboards, ads, etc. with complete anonymity as well. Thanks and good luck!
Asteroids.
My theory is:
if we all spread this stupid message to all other forums, billboards, ads etc. the computers will explode because of the stupid content of these comments and theories, therefore the earth will blow up.
i feel dumber for even glancing at the content of that link.
There's really no hurry. There's plenty more morphology and physiology to go through.
A good progressive would answer "Just keep doing what we're doing."
but he/she wants to do it in her/his lifetime?
WHY!!!!!
the earth would stand a better chance without us.
it would stand a better chance without people starting a topic like this!
Aw that was poppy but fun. Strangelets! Some are more tongue in cheek than others, but Im especially dubious of 6. Youd have to what, change the basic parameters of probability for the universe?
My moneys on Grey goo!
5 kg of Botulism Toxin A should do it.
Why are we trying to destroy it again? I thought I was trying to save it. Although I'm not doing much of anything right now except writing emails and posting on Web forums.
I think #4 is my favorite.
Realtors, talking on their cell phones and driving their hummers.
If only we were more profit oriented...
why sweat it with all those wacky schemes? the sun will do the job for us in 2 or 3 billion years...
I had a dream about grey goo once. There was just this island city of heaped up techno salvage on a rocky outcrop from fallen sea levels, surrounded by a beach like glacier crags of ejected inert matter left in successive tides consumption like a sore in the midst of a vast glistening dark grey sea all crusty and crumpled on the shore like like metalic creme brulle.
someone has too much time on their hands
^ Namely, Luke Kakizaki, the jap with the stereotypical one-inch dick.
I've been working with Mel and she's a pretty nice gal. We currently consist of a team of 10 or so highly-trained professionals.
The ultimate goal of our group is the destruction of humanity. It is in our belief that the ultimate meaning of existence involves destruction of what existed, and that humans, which exist like any other atom, must also be destroyed. But this doesn't mean just waiting until Nature does it for us. We can't be couch potatoes about this. The meaning of life not only to destroy what existed, but to do so as fast as possible. It's too bad most people are blind to this -- that's why we're here.
It seems at the moment that the method that would have the highest guarantee of total extinction of humanity would be destruction of the Earth. We have thought about just using a lot of h-nukes, among other methods, but realized that there would be a higher probability of remaining humans after execution of the plan. Furthermore, destruction of the earth would be like hitting two birds with one stone, in light of the meaning of life.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.