Archinect
anchor

Cutting edge

rethinkit

What would you consider cutting edge architecture and design?

 
Jul 12, 09 5:47 pm
xtbl

what does "cutting edge" mean?

Jul 12, 09 7:18 pm  · 
 · 
drums please, Fab?


alternate subtitle: The Ultimate Love/Skate Relationship

Jul 12, 09 7:50 pm  · 
 · 
Janosh

There's cutting edge architectural technology; I don't think there is any cutting edge architecture.

Jul 12, 09 8:55 pm  · 
 · 
Per--Corell

Thank you !

Jul 13, 09 12:46 am  · 
 · 
sgs23

That's hard to say, but I know it when I see it.

Jul 13, 09 3:33 am  · 
 · 
randomized

cutting edge is so 2008

Jul 13, 09 4:14 am  · 
 · 
chupacabra

Cutting Edge sounds more 1996 to me. Pre - Internet Ubiquity.

Jul 13, 09 11:59 am  · 
 · 
aspect

when it comes to cutting edge, architect is the last person u should ask... especially here is a bleeding ground for "good old days" arch opinions...

go to grap a sci-fi comics, japs anime or scientific america, u will find inspirations.


Jul 13, 09 12:09 pm  · 
 · 
Cacaphonous Approval Bot

grabbing a comic book?
umm, that actually is 'the good old days'

doomed to repeat, tragedy and farce, etc etc.

Jul 13, 09 12:49 pm  · 
 · 
LucasGray

Can actual architecture be cutting edge? I mean by the time a building is finished with construction its already a year or two old and could even be dated by 5 to 10 years depending on the project. Architecture is an inherently slow process grounding it in the past more than the present or future.

Look at what is on the drawing boards of some innovative offices to see whats cutting edge.

Jul 13, 09 2:20 pm  · 
 · 
bRink

Is "cutting edge" really desirable from a design or practice point of view? To me, to be positioned as "cutting edge" sort of sounds "trendy"...

IMHO a good place to be is more enduring and progressive... Of course innovation is important, but I think there is a tendency sometimes to over-hype newness in design... I'm not sure "cutting edge" should be the benchmark for good work... Contemporary art maybe, but architecture or architecture ideas need to last... Good architecture has to still be good architecture after 10 or 20 years...

Jul 14, 09 12:10 am  · 
 · 
Per--Corell

Again it has not been the real cutting edge architecture we seen, we see images of it. We seen paintings of it how the surface of it ,the skin, tapestry the issue. Underneath it has been the old stuf and eerything been restricted to what you can make with what allready are here methods that allready are here. By core only very little cutting architecture has been realised to be tested. And as architects been acting like painters, only delivered an image of it, something that shuld only picture it, becaurse of that, the real cutting edge been forgotten, it's to difficult, it ask creativity and an ability to think in new terms, in compleatly new directions, and that is difficult.

Jul 14, 09 7:09 am  · 
 · 

Block this user


Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?

Archinect


This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.

  • ×Search in: