Southern California Institute of Architecture (SCI-Arc)
Pratt Institute
University of Southern California (USC)
Tulane University
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
Temple University
University of Oregon
Cranbrook Academy of Art
New York Institute of Technology (NYIT)
Kansas State University
[Undergrad] Berkeley-UCLA-Texas A&M
I know both of them offers BA in Architectural Studies, but I am wondering what are the difference between them, which one is better prepare a student to go to grad sch. by the way, I am majoring the B of Environmental Design in Texas A&M. Do you thiink i should go to one of those UC(i was admitted by both already) or stay in Texas. Thank you
How much of the ENDS curriculum have you completed at A&M?
Do you know how much of the credit would transfer for credit?
All three are fine schools - with the Cali schools being more design/theory oriented, and A&M being more technically driven...
I finished at A&M in December and was accepted to several top notch grad programs>UT-Austin, SCI-Arc, Pratt, USC, (still wait-listed at UCLA)
My suggestion would be to finish up undergrad at A&M, then go to Berkeley or UCLA for the accredited M. Arch degree. That to me sounds like a well-balanced education> the technical/practical/more industry driven education from TX A&M paired with a more theoretical/conceptual/digital design aspect from one of the Cali schools.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.