Archinect
anchor

Advice on applying to an MArch program

lost in stress

I'm sure there have been many students posting the "what should I do" thread. Alas, here goes another one. I guess to start I'll list my background and current status. I originally started my undergraduate degree at the University of Wisconsin - Madison, studying Chemical Engineering. After 3.2 years, yes I said 3.2 years, I realized I hated it. I pulled out of the program and took a Japanese course as well as a few studio classes. Art was the other area in High School that I showed talent so it made sense when I was doing my "soul searching". When my 4th year concluded I realized that Madison wouldn't offer the opportunities in art that I wanted. So I applied as a transfer student to a plethora of art schools and got in into many of them, my portfolio at the time was sufficient to land me a spot... but it wasn't by any means inspiring. I eventually decided to go to The School of the Art Institute of Chicago (SAIC). Oh, I spent a year at a community college (MATC) while I deferred at SAIC, I needed to wait in order to be considered independent status and the courses I took were cheap and transfered. Up to this moment my GPA wasn't stellar, 2.75 at Madison and 3.98 at MATC. Upon arriving at SAIC i hadn't a clear path or idea of where I was heading. I bounced from paintings and drawings to designed objects and finally resting in the architecture department. My first 1.5 years at SAIC weren't easy, financial problems kept me from going fulltime with a few semesters of class withdrawals (the dreaded "W" on a transcript)... affording $32,000 for tuition isn't as easy as I thought it would be.

Our architecture department is young, the MArch program is in its final stages of being accredited. The undergraduate department offers architecture studio classes but isn't accredited. So, I'll be graduating with a BFA. Since my first encounter with architecture two years ago, I have found to immerse myself in everything that is Design related... not just architectural design but design as a method of practice.

SAIC has helped me make tremendous strides in my work. All my projects, that I'm including in my portfolio, have been met with great enthusiasm from my teachers and professors. This is my final year and I'm concluding it with a year long research project dealing with urban design, sustainability, design technology (parametric design to be specific), and form in terms of performance. Over the past few semesters I've carefully thought of what interests me about architecture and what I hope to pursue in my graduate work. I have concluded with a very finite statement of intent based on the work I have seen and a realization about my process as well.

So with all that in mind here's where I'm lead astray. SAIC is a pass/fail system, they implemented that so students would focus on the development of an idea rather than the letter grade obtained. It works for some and it doesn't work for others, in my case it worked. So the only real GPA I have is from Madison and MATC. At Madison my GPA was very sluggish, but considering I was a ChemE student... that isn't bad. I'm concerned that the lack of a strong GPA is going to hurt me.

I will be applying to MArch programs that are intended for those without a BArch or BS in Architectural Studies. I will have a BFA (132 credits to graduate! yikes... pretty much a BA with a minor in art history) but my work is centered around design. I've heard that the professional master's programs tend to want a diverse student body. So my designed oriented course of study might also be a hinderance, considering that I could've done anything with a BFA and I chose architectural design.

On a good note, I'm 90% sure that I will be getting really good letters of recommendations. The teachers that really appreciate my work also happen to be respected in their field as well as the academic world.

My portfolio consists of design, sculpture, paintings and drawings (sketches actually), most of which of have A LOT of content behind the work.

Haven't taken my GRE, but that should be about par to good...hoping more towards the good.

If you've made it to this point in the thread, congrats you just got the cliff's notes on my higher education. So here's you're treat... the questions. Am I competitive? I have no real way of judging myself. I don't know who I'm competing against when I apply. More specifically am I competitive enough for GSD or GSAPP? Ultimately I would love to study at Columbia, what I intend to investigate during my graduate work is what they focus on.

I plan to apply this fall, however the research project won't be complete until next spring. At the culmination of this project I will be showing it both locally and possibly internationally. The studio course is granted by motorola and thus produces work that gets press coverage. In previous years, the studio class has shown in NYC and Milan. Should I wait until this project is complete and apply next fall, as it will strengthen my portfolio, or go ahead and apply this year? I'd rather not waste any more time, i'm 27 and realized my passion is architecture.

I know my abilities and what my goals are. The only thing I don't know is what I might look like to an admissions committee. Hopefully I painted a true and unbiased picture of myself. Any criticism is welcomed and any recommendations would be great!

 
Sep 10, 08 10:23 am
idiotwind

try searching previous threads asshole

Sep 11, 08 3:16 am  · 
 · 
Living in Gin

Fuck off, blackharp.

Unlike many of the M.Arch. advice threads ("I got accepted to Gravel Pit Community College and Harvard. Which one should I go to?"), the OP has a somewhat unique situation that isn't necessarily be addressed in previous threads, and tnguyen at least took the time to compose a message that explains his/her background in detail.

I have some thoughts on the questions raised in the OP, but don't have time to address them at the moment. Stay tuned.

Sep 11, 08 10:06 am  · 
 · 
psteiner

Hi -
Right away I can't offer a quick response - I need to re-read it. But I wanted to say, we're probably crossing paths at SAIC. I graduated BIA 2005 and am back there taking one class - Vectorworks. I am currently am un-employed architect to-be....((ANYONE HIRING??))

we should trade emails or something. I'd really be interested in talking with you. seeing your portfolio too. who's your studio instructor?

-pamela

Sep 12, 08 11:25 am  · 
 · 
idiotwind

hey gin :) nice to see you on here, buddy

Sep 12, 08 6:58 pm  · 
 · 
mantaray
SAIC is a pass/fail system, they implemented that so students would focus on the development of an idea rather than the letter grade obtained.

NO WAY! I have LONG thought that would be such an improvement to a design school education. Many many med schools are going that route, too, for the same reason... why focus on grades when it's more important to focus on the information you need to master, when you have to pass your boards anyway?

Anyway, yeah, props to the SAIC! I already was intrigued by their program and now even more so.


Sep 12, 08 9:59 pm  · 
 · 
lost in stress

It's really a great system, if given the right student. I've had way too many classes where some kids waste time and finish with a half-assed projects; on the transcript we both get "credit" next to the class. But, like med school, our equivalent to boards is our portfolio. So really in the end, what you put in is what you get out.

Mantaray, here's a little more info about SAIC if you're interested. SAIC is a transdisciplinary design school, AIADO (architecture, interior architecture and design objects). They want design students to collaborative work together and learn from each other, instead of architects in one room and designed objects in another. They are also trying to position themselves as a progressive design school... considering our neighbors, UIC (theory) and IIT (balanced education), we have to push the bar and see where it can go. We are doing a lot to get our name out there as innovators in the field. The GFRY studio program is a serious studio class that ends in real world products and ideas. Here's a link to one of the designs that came out of the class last year.

link

Check out Industreal, four of GFRY students design's got picked up by them, near the bottom... the "USA" ones

Also, Bruce Mau has set up a studio in our AIADO department. Both the Bruce Mau and GFRY studio only enroll qualified applicants, grad or undergrad. If you have what it takes, then they'll take you. It is a very different program, and the only way they can get away with that is the fact that it is such a young department. They don't have an identity yet, so they're trying to establish one. But this school isn't for everyone, i've seen students flee to other schools because of the lack of structure (on the undergraduate level) and the opportunity for exploration.

Wow! I type to much, sorry guys. Next time I'll try to limit myself to 50 words!

Sep 12, 08 11:22 pm  · 
 · 

Block this user


Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?

Archinect


This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.

  • ×Search in: