Interesting video. If one assumes their position of a missle or military jet hitting the pentagon, it begs the question of what happened to the American Airlines flight and the people who were on board?

I have seen another site where a case is made that the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania was actually shot down by american fighter jets.

conspiracy theories will always abound when the government is the target (or aggressor - i make no conclusions). the vidoe is interesting, and also quite frightening. if you take it at face value, then there really can be no argument. though, with digital editing anything is possible...hell, there are even people who say the first landing on the moon was staged in hollywood on a closed set. "who can you trust?"

I for one, don't think much of it...sure the Feds confiscated all of the footage from adj. buildings, in order to control what is shown on Tv...any Govm't would. Who are all those people being quoted? they could all be made up.
I can add this: I live adj. to Arlington Cemetery and fly in/out of Washington National twice a month. Most small (8-15) person planes land on the diagonal runway which is situated on a NW axis. So if winds are out of the south, you would be flying almost directly over the pentagon on approach, and flying pretty low.
Personally, I belive that the flight that ended in PA, was shot down by the Govm't. But this...well sounds a bit sketchy.

Boy do I not want to believe in that...

I have a client whose office at the pentagon was hit. he survived, and received several commendations for his actions that day.

I really don't want to believe that film.

didnt they shoot down the plane that dropped in penn so it wouldnt do disaster to more buildings(i.e. the white house)?

Sure, but they really dont want the American people thinking they've resorted to that yet. If you believe the conspiracy.

wasn't the theory that in pennsylvania passengers took
over the cockpit and forced the plane to crash land...i.e.
the 'lets roll' communication from a cell phone on that plane
from a man i can't remember the name of...but was a judo expert or
the like..

Among other things, Atta's passport and the "put options" for airline stocks.

Ok good conspiricacy I think your right.
I'll get malner on right away.

this is fun too:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cutter.html

The performance of WTC 7 is of significant interest because it appears the collapse was due primarily to fire, rather than any impact damage from the collapsing towers. Prior to September 11, 2001, there was little, if any, record of fire-induced collapse of large fire-protected steel buildings.

Isn’t it that the impact damage blasted the fire protection from the steel therefore exposing the structure to the fire induced by aircraft fuel? A combination of both impact and fire.

The bit about the Pentagon plane having to travel at 500+ mph only 2' above the ground is the most intriguing part to me

Well, considering the fire department couldnt get in to put the fires out, the fire protection would eventually burn off. It's not permanent. It is only meant to protect the steel long enough for the building to be evacuated. In addition, a fire caused by jet fuel would be much much hotter than a normal fire, thus speeding up the process.

First of all there were no hijacked Boeing 747's on Sept. 11, 2001. It was a Boeing 757 that crashed into the Pentagon and Boeing 767's that crashed into the twin towers. A 747 is a much larger aircraft than both the 757 and 767.

BOTS -
there wasn't any impact on building 7 of the WTC, just the towers. maybe something can be said for jet fuel burning hotter, but you must admit, the video of building 7 falling uniformly and neatly into its own footprint is kind of insane.

didnt WTC 7 have a large reserve of diesel fuel in it for back-up generators???

mdler..

i think the website talks about that...and how diesel fuel
doesn't burn that hot...

So what happened to the flight that supposedly hit the pentagon? Did that flight and all of the passengers not exist? Also, considering that a large section of the pentagon building collapsed, I find it hard to believe that the plane's point of impact would remain as a perfect hole. And witnesses being able to make a convincing distinction between a plane and a missle hitting the building? Thats worth believing.