I can't tell if you're trolling. I've never heard of an M.Int.Arch but interior design is different from architecture. Not a licensed profession...and also, I hear, much more lucrative. Though of course there will be overlaps in the concepts and skills you learn.
Hey, you should wait for the GSD to start its furniture/interiors program. :P
Not trolling. Found an M.Int.Arch program at UCLA. It seemed so different and never really heard of an M.Int.Arch degree either so that's why I was asking. I figured it was still within the realm of design and that basic concepts were still taught in the program.
But this is the point of the question; if it's that different?
It can be more lucrative, depending on how it's practiced, because as a non-licensed practice, interior designers can take commissions from the manufacturers whose products they specify (or can straight up buy and resell these things at a markup), whereas the licensed profession of architecture forbid this.
Ofc, there are architects whose work could probably mostly be done by interior designers/architects, and larger architecture firms may have staff who work on interiors only. But the fact that one is a licensed profession and the other is not is huge--not as a value judgement, but just as a general descriptor of conditions in school and in practice.
A clearer way to say this might be to say that the work of certain interior designers and certain licensed architects might look quite similar, as in the case between psychiatrists (who are MDs, who can prescribe drugs, and who are subject to specific professional requirements and licensure) and psychologists (who could have a wider range of backgrounds and kinds of practices). But, as for psychiatrists and psychologists, there are also hard lines that distinguish one profession from the other, in school and in practice. Look at the wikipedia articles for the two, or at the websites of the AIA or NCARB.
You don't have to get licensed if you go to architecture school, though--and in that case your work could be more like the work of any number of other fields.
Nov 3, 12 11:36 am ·
·
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.
Are all M.Arch degrees created equal?
Just a curiosity of mine. I was wondering if Architecture was the same as engineering or other fields?
If one goes for an M.Arch in interiors (M.Int.Arch) could one go into other fields of architecture?
Do all arch programs teach you the basics of design and one can go into different fields or arch ,or are you confined to that one area of expertise?
How does it work? I apologize in advance for the dumb questions.
I can't tell if you're trolling. I've never heard of an M.Int.Arch but interior design is different from architecture. Not a licensed profession...and also, I hear, much more lucrative. Though of course there will be overlaps in the concepts and skills you learn.
Hey, you should wait for the GSD to start its furniture/interiors program. :P
Not trolling. Found an M.Int.Arch program at UCLA. It seemed so different and never really heard of an M.Int.Arch degree either so that's why I was asking. I figured it was still within the realm of design and that basic concepts were still taught in the program.
But this is the point of the question; if it's that different?
Interiors much more lucrative?
It can be more lucrative, depending on how it's practiced, because as a non-licensed practice, interior designers can take commissions from the manufacturers whose products they specify (or can straight up buy and resell these things at a markup), whereas the licensed profession of architecture forbid this.
Ofc, there are architects whose work could probably mostly be done by interior designers/architects, and larger architecture firms may have staff who work on interiors only. But the fact that one is a licensed profession and the other is not is huge--not as a value judgement, but just as a general descriptor of conditions in school and in practice.
A clearer way to say this might be to say that the work of certain interior designers and certain licensed architects might look quite similar, as in the case between psychiatrists (who are MDs, who can prescribe drugs, and who are subject to specific professional requirements and licensure) and psychologists (who could have a wider range of backgrounds and kinds of practices). But, as for psychiatrists and psychologists, there are also hard lines that distinguish one profession from the other, in school and in practice. Look at the wikipedia articles for the two, or at the websites of the AIA or NCARB.
You don't have to get licensed if you go to architecture school, though--and in that case your work could be more like the work of any number of other fields.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.