After 20 years specialising in interiors, I now shoot for HOK, Gensler, SOM, Interior Design magazine etc and am based in New York. There is a pdf of my folio that can be downloaded from the site which shows my favorite selection.
As it is hard to edit things down, I worry that there is too much work up there.
Anyway, please take a look and post your thoughts - honesty please!
There is a lot of work that I like in your portfolio but there are some things that are really conservative and cliche. I mean where there's a client that wants that then that's what they get but, I'm telling you from an aestic point of view.
i find that little diatribe about yourself a little distracting cause it alone occupies the focal point of the entire website. are you trying to sell your photography skill or your abbreviated biography?... i'd personally put it in an 'about myself' link...or...give it less prominance off to the side. it could even occupy a side frame that stays always up like the top one does during viewing of your actual images
and i'd take this little bit of pretentiousness out.. it adds nothing: Whether it is Steve Jobs asking me to spend 8 months shooting his NY flagship Apple store,
or photographing a $40,000 minimum bet private casino in London's Mayfair,
the interiors you would never normally see are on this website for you to enjoy.
you also might want to consider putting a signature/watermark/copyright on each image
Could you be a bit more specific of which images you don't like. Unfortunately I have some clients who are more conservative and they get scared by pushing boundaries. I shoot for advertising as well as those who literaly want a spatial record of their work, so the site has to appeal to a cross section of clients.
If you download the pdf, it really is a more concise selection of the kind of way I prefer to shoot.
i also use point and shoot technic when i am photoing whatever. and love to have 32 mp camera. mine is a lowly 4-5 mp bulky fuji that works fine for some shooting, thus snapshot photographer in my bio (even though i have not been as lucky as you to be flown to hotel rooms etc.)
there is an element of saturation in your photo samples. it is hard to look at sooo many photograps without additional information whic makes some of the claims appear to be bogus., even though that might not be the case.
your home page borderlines between financial sevices co. and professional hopeful. when you advertise yourself as ambitiously as you are in the realm of architects and designers, you have to be a bit more careful about every graphic and text messege you are conveying.
good luck. you are almost there. i am honest. be careful with overexposed lamps. i can get away with it as a writer but you can't as an interiors photographer.
Interior/architectural photography website
I just updated my website and would really appreciate any feedback.
www.interiorphotography.net
After 20 years specialising in interiors, I now shoot for HOK, Gensler, SOM, Interior Design magazine etc and am based in New York. There is a pdf of my folio that can be downloaded from the site which shows my favorite selection.
As it is hard to edit things down, I worry that there is too much work up there.
Anyway, please take a look and post your thoughts - honesty please!
Adrian Wilson
New York
212.729.7077
There is a lot of work that I like in your portfolio but there are some things that are really conservative and cliche. I mean where there's a client that wants that then that's what they get but, I'm telling you from an aestic point of view.
i find that little diatribe about yourself a little distracting cause it alone occupies the focal point of the entire website. are you trying to sell your photography skill or your abbreviated biography?... i'd personally put it in an 'about myself' link...or...give it less prominance off to the side. it could even occupy a side frame that stays always up like the top one does during viewing of your actual images
and i'd take this little bit of pretentiousness out.. it adds nothing:
Whether it is Steve Jobs asking me to spend 8 months shooting his NY flagship Apple store,
or photographing a $40,000 minimum bet private casino in London's Mayfair,
the interiors you would never normally see are on this website for you to enjoy.
you also might want to consider putting a signature/watermark/copyright on each image
Mark,
Could you be a bit more specific of which images you don't like. Unfortunately I have some clients who are more conservative and they get scared by pushing boundaries. I shoot for advertising as well as those who literaly want a spatial record of their work, so the site has to appeal to a cross section of clients.
If you download the pdf, it really is a more concise selection of the kind of way I prefer to shoot.
Adrian
i also use point and shoot technic when i am photoing whatever. and love to have 32 mp camera. mine is a lowly 4-5 mp bulky fuji that works fine for some shooting, thus snapshot photographer in my bio (even though i have not been as lucky as you to be flown to hotel rooms etc.)
there is an element of saturation in your photo samples. it is hard to look at sooo many photograps without additional information whic makes some of the claims appear to be bogus., even though that might not be the case.
your home page borderlines between financial sevices co. and professional hopeful. when you advertise yourself as ambitiously as you are in the realm of architects and designers, you have to be a bit more careful about every graphic and text messege you are conveying.
good luck. you are almost there. i am honest. be careful with overexposed lamps. i can get away with it as a writer but you can't as an interiors photographer.
Is it just me or is the portfolio only one page for everyone else?
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.