Hi, I really want some suggestions and opinions about my thesis topic or if any one has done something on this then plz share ur ideas with me.
I have a quest to find delight and pleasure in architecture. It can't be subjective quality as the delightful events in life are common to most of us. I wanted to design a building for those who are stressed by their daily routine and desire for a place for relaxation at times. My adviser suggested me to do a health and wellness center in order to fulfill my ideas.
In that center I want to engage people by providing sensory active places making one's experience more memorable because if the experience which is unlike common experience is might be memorable and thus can be delightful. In that case I have studied architecture of Peter Zumthor, Stevan Holl and few concepts of Bernard Tshumi.
In my first jury, A juror said that I can't claim that what I'm doing is going to relief stress of a person without any scientific proof...I am still thinking how to justify my working even when it is very common for all of us, but still I want a scientific proof is it so important to become a psychologist instead of an architect?
Kindly suggest openly what I can do to make my self more clear plus if anyone has some idea then plz share !
only within forms sensory information converge to us. if you re able to design for each senses the same "message" then this experience it must be within forms
Engaging sensibilities for the promotion of well- being
Hi, I really want some suggestions and opinions about my thesis topic or if any one has done something on this then plz share ur ideas with me.
I have a quest to find delight and pleasure in architecture. It can't be subjective quality as the delightful events in life are common to most of us. I wanted to design a building for those who are stressed by their daily routine and desire for a place for relaxation at times. My adviser suggested me to do a health and wellness center in order to fulfill my ideas.
In that center I want to engage people by providing sensory active places making one's experience more memorable because if the experience which is unlike common experience is might be memorable and thus can be delightful. In that case I have studied architecture of Peter Zumthor, Stevan Holl and few concepts of Bernard Tshumi.
In my first jury, A juror said that I can't claim that what I'm doing is going to relief stress of a person without any scientific proof...I am still thinking how to justify my working even when it is very common for all of us, but still I want a scientific proof is it so important to become a psychologist instead of an architect?
Kindly suggest openly what I can do to make my self more clear plus if anyone has some idea then plz share !
Maram
only within forms sensory information converge to us. if you re able to design for each senses the same "message" then this experience it must be within forms
http://www.oneata.eu/article/within-forms/1/15/
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.