Which is better? I mean, on the one hand, I realize that Columbia is an outstanding institution through sensory perception and reasoning....on the other hand, my own rational self-interest leads me to believe that Objectivism comes out on top in this match-up.
Would anyone else like to pursue happiness by comparing Columbia to something else? It is my objective opinion that you do so.
Wonderk- I don't understand why your Objectivism might not enable you to create a catalyst towards your own endeavorers in a institution be it Columbia or any other. Yes.. there may be a structure that is in place at any university but if you really have some thing to offer, the university will work with you and your Objectivist ideas. You should be working with your own ideas, your ideas that really get you off. They will truly lead you some place because you truly believe in them. It is only your curiosity and your determination that will be exonerated. Thats why they have scholarships and grants. They will invest in You because of your Objectivism.
anyway, if you have to ask us, you're not an objectivist.
if you're willing to listen to anything they might teach you at columbia, you're not an objectivist.
if you value any learning beyond what's inherently in you, inspired by your own hubris, then you're not an objectivist.
objectivism is so one-dimensional and so rigid a system of thought that i think if you're truly an objectivist, there's no room for anything else. in a rock/paper/scissor-style matchup, objectivism would win every time.
Columbia vs. Objectivism
Which is better? I mean, on the one hand, I realize that Columbia is an outstanding institution through sensory perception and reasoning....on the other hand, my own rational self-interest leads me to believe that Objectivism comes out on top in this match-up.
Would anyone else like to pursue happiness by comparing Columbia to something else? It is my objective opinion that you do so.
I would figure many of the people who do to columbia, are indeed, objectivists in some way. Probably covering up as socialists though.
Objective Sleep vs. Columbia
Wonderk- I don't understand why your Objectivism might not enable you to create a catalyst towards your own endeavorers in a institution be it Columbia or any other. Yes.. there may be a structure that is in place at any university but if you really have some thing to offer, the university will work with you and your Objectivist ideas. You should be working with your own ideas, your ideas that really get you off. They will truly lead you some place because you truly believe in them. It is only your curiosity and your determination that will be exonerated. Thats why they have scholarships and grants. They will invest in You because of your Objectivism.
and yes Columbia is bad ass MIT is dope as well
Ayn Rand would kick Columbia's ass just as easily as Chuck Norris would...
maybe ayn rand was chuck norris' mother...
anyway, if you have to ask us, you're not an objectivist.
if you're willing to listen to anything they might teach you at columbia, you're not an objectivist.
if you value any learning beyond what's inherently in you, inspired by your own hubris, then you're not an objectivist.
objectivism is so one-dimensional and so rigid a system of thought that i think if you're truly an objectivist, there's no room for anything else. in a rock/paper/scissor-style matchup, objectivism would win every time.
Oh Apu, what have you done?
you should check out the real estate development program at columbia....
how about architecture vs. objectivism
The cheese stands alone.
MUWAHAHAHAHA, be careful what you wish for DubK!
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.