The problem with this is that were so early on in the development of sincere nanotech that its practically impossible to project its practical implications. The possibilities seem limitless, but everything behaves so much differently at this scale, solids become liquids, insulators become conductors, it will take decades and centuries to work it all out. As it is we are likely a decade at least from self-replication, and I dont really think real nanotech becomes economically viable until that point. You could start with understanding material science, the theoretical limits of nanotube structures, permiable membranes, adaptable surfaces, etc. There isnt much outside of that that isnt purely speculative.
do you have links pertaining to the subject which goes into substantial depth? I'm primarily concerned with the direct applications of such conecepts and also in the implications of nanotech in the field of architecture in the future. One of the topics i found was morphogenesis and biomimicry but i need a more direct relation. Can anyone help me?
It make a good sense to expect what we can't realise, but nano shuldn't be a bad exchouse either and, it is not true that the concept havn't already had huge impac, the theories about how it could reproduct , has it to be one function only, the prospect are surely bright but, need we wait for cheap houses becaurse of that, can't we start building big before doing the same small , and beside houses are made from Bricks , you know -- so unless you want to Kill The Brick, you either get nanno becaurse we newer learn how to reform the manufactoring , so we might end up with options but no experience in creating that sort of assembly line.
Nanotechnology in Architecture
The problem with this is that were so early on in the development of sincere nanotech that its practically impossible to project its practical implications. The possibilities seem limitless, but everything behaves so much differently at this scale, solids become liquids, insulators become conductors, it will take decades and centuries to work it all out. As it is we are likely a decade at least from self-replication, and I dont really think real nanotech becomes economically viable until that point. You could start with understanding material science, the theoretical limits of nanotube structures, permiable membranes, adaptable surfaces, etc. There isnt much outside of that that isnt purely speculative.
do you have links pertaining to the subject which goes into substantial depth? I'm primarily concerned with the direct applications of such conecepts and also in the implications of nanotech in the field of architecture in the future. One of the topics i found was morphogenesis and biomimicry but i need a more direct relation. Can anyone help me?
Could nanotechnology really have such a major influence?
It make a good sense to expect what we can't realise, but nano shuldn't be a bad exchouse either and, it is not true that the concept havn't already had huge impac, the theories about how it could reproduct , has it to be one function only, the prospect are surely bright but, need we wait for cheap houses becaurse of that, can't we start building big before doing the same small , and beside houses are made from Bricks , you know -- so unless you want to Kill The Brick, you either get nanno becaurse we newer learn how to reform the manufactoring , so we might end up with options but no experience in creating that sort of assembly line.
hello
I AM PHD STUDENT
I AM FROM IRAQ
can I JOHN YOU IN NANOTECHNOLOGY?
I also have the same interest
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.