New link to portfolio: [link removed by OP]

No hand sketches? no design iteration/progress work?  Where is the craft? where is the idea generation process? where is the creativity?  Without this, it's just another stale assortment of generic renderings.

I would disagree on the necessity of hand sketches, I could care less if someone who graduated in 2024 has a great hand and presentable progress work in that medium. That said, show it if you got it…

However, I do very much want to see something. Diagrams, iteration, research… whatever it takes to show your idea, the reasoning, and process. You talk about things that don’t make sense without it. Exploration of mass and void? Where is this exploration at? Autonomously generated forms? What does that mean, how did you do it?  Local design influence and emphasis on views? Evidence?

The graphics are nice enough, clean, etc. I think a little too much of the linework drawing content is included considering how simplistic most of it is, even if it generally looks nice. I think your renderings are nice, but a little drab. I don’t think they are quite enough to really pop out of the page at me, and you’ve sacrificed the vibrance of your design representation for consistency and style. It might benefit you to have some diversity of rendering styles, as I don’t think the type you’re going with are industry typical, and being able to render to industry standards is a big marketability plus for a fresh grad, at least where I’m at. 

I agree with the too much linework, but I don't think you need to rework renderings and disagree with the comment that they feel drab.  I think you are coming from a Scandinavian education so stylistically it makes sense.  

I think the pages need better layout and focal point. A lot of the linework images are hard to read at a quick glance and because they have a similar weight and you loose hierarchy. I was once told every drawing should have five line weights and had an old school teacher used to slam his hand on my drafting board and demand that I shown him one pen for each finger. No more no less.  Yes I'm old, but the same still hold for CAD drafting. 

Most portfolios will only be glanced at. Think about how someone's eye moves around the page and make that as easy as possible.  Squint at each page spread. Where does your eye go first? Then Second, third, forth? Are all of those clear?  For your pages I find I'm quickly drawn to the color graphic but then with the line work images my eye doesn't know where to look first and the frustration causes me to quickly look to the next page or bounce between images.  

Things that could help include, heavier  poche on section cuts, heavier ground plane lines on sections, adding atmosphere and depth to the drawings with shadows or exterior washes of color.  Heavy, medium, fine lines. things look different on screen than in print and you need to over exaggerate the differences in line weights for the screen. 

Think more superficially, more pages with a single image, or series of closely related images. Assume people will do stupid things like look at it at half size without enlarging to fill the screen or zooming in. It should still make an impact and leave a positive impression. The writing comes last you can do less of it. Label important things clearly but obvious labels like "elevation" or "section" can fade back. 

You're making good progress. keep it up. 

Agree with JL , definitely need to turn up a notch ( not too much )  on line weight / back ground colour for sections, elevations, ground plane . Snip below is an example ( i would use light grey for solid wall though ) ...experiment is the key/ see how it looks

Good points! It’s really giving to hear your thoughts - thanks. And a clarification with the example! Appreciate it!

i think your portfolio is really good. i see on your cv that you have previously worked as an architectural intern. since you’re applying to jobs, you could also put some work from your internships at the back of the portfolio. some employers want to see experience not just in academia but in work/internships too. 

Any more tips on adjustments or how general opinions are more than welcome

I would not advice to redo your portfolio - it is a solid demonstration of where you are.
Instead I would advice to build your experience in  more varied and complex building types.
You seem to have a fairly firm grasp on the  technical.

updated portfolio: [link removed by OP]

for American audience lose your pic . Lends itself to pre-judging which may preclude employment opportunities. I know young people think it’s ok and a positive but it aint .