A BS.Arch is a great option if your daughter is not 100% sold on being an architect.  A B.Arch is much more optimal for the reasons you listed, but only if she is sold.  It is very likely that she won't really have much time for a job during the semester; the workload even in a BS program can be very intense.  On the financial side, cheaper is better, especially if she is thinking of an M.Arch in the future; unlicensed architects (interns we call them) don't make much money right out of school even with an M.Arch.  Most employers don't offer more money to an applicant with an M.Arch in lieu of a B.Arch or BS.Arch.  If they do, it's not much. 

I went to UVA for grad school; it was a fantastic experience.  The faculty were all extremely warm, welcoming, and knowledgable.  Even though the program is top tier, I never had anyone make me feel like I didn't belong there.  Additionally, UVA is known for its wide alumni network which really has helped me in the long run.  

Because you are in NYS, I'll say currently NYS allows BS.Arch grads to become licensed through additional experience requirements - 5 years of experience in lieu of 2 or 3 - but I wouldn't bank on having that opportunity in the future.  She may want to get her license in a different state right out of school or they may change the rules. Who knows.

I think people who want to do architecture in career will eventually get licensed regardless of their undergrad experience. 

I am from Washu now going into grad school. About 3/5 of the entire class stayed studying architecture at senior year. Among them, 1/2 choose to go to grad school right away and most got into top grad schools such as Harvard, MIT, Yale, GSAPP, and penn

have you seen the economy lately?? DO NOT pay 50k+ for a b.s. in architecture. your daughter will have to pursue a costly masters afterwards if she wants to get licensed. let it be something she chooses to do, assuming she wants to pursue architecture after the education (fair warning: many students drop out of these programs, for good reason. they are very demanding and not for anyone; another reason not to overpay).

this is a really simple choice: syracuse = better degree for less money, from a great program that you/she are excited about. the one hesitation is based on a false assumption at best, delusion about prestige at worst. i don't see much difference in respectability between any of these programs, but if she's really concerned about climbing the ivory tower, many students from syracuse go on to "prestigious" school (again, extremely debatable how valuable that is).

Thanks for the post!

Syracuse gives her a NAAB accredited degree, which she'll need if she wants to get licensed, plus, it'll qualify her for "post-professional" masters degrees. Post-professional degrees can be as short as one year and are typically research/theory focused, so she would still be able to pursue the academic route and finish in 6 years (5+1 vs 4+2). The B.Arch also will give her more negotiating power and marketability when looking for a job upon graduation. And it's free given her scholarship ;)

Thanks to all who all who replied. All very useful and assisted her/us in making the final decision. Trouble was she too many great options. I am sure she would excel at each one of them and all were tough to pass up for various reasons. While WashU, UVA and GT would, no doubt, all be great to spend the next four years at, in the end she felt that she fit in best at Syracuse (and as I said, Dean Speaks, Dean Buccina/Dana M. and their team really rose to the challenge during this whole covid-19/virtual admitted days thing like no one else) and committed today. She knows that she always has the option of a post-professional degree at one of the other schools. There are times you wish you be more than one person. Thanks. Go 'Cuse.