Can anyone comment on UPENN, USC and UCLA -SUPRASTUDIO-Guvenc Ozel(all M.Arch II)? I am more inclined towards the digital/parametric style!

I loved UCLA, being on the west coast an heard a lot of good things about it. But Suprastudio (UCLA) restricts me to Guvenc Ozel's studio with restricted electives. I actually applied for Greg Lynn's studio, so they are already not giving me the studio of my choice. Plus I din know who Guvenc is until recently. They have offered me some scholarship though. 

USC, on the other hand, I havnt heard many great things, but I personally love the alumni work. They have good faculty like Alving Huang, Neil Leach which would allow me to go towards the parametric direction. Plus I simply love the electives they are offering and a huge number of them.  I also have heard alot about the TROJAN network, which is said to be very strong. And most importantly they gave me a full tuition waiver ($$$$)

Upenn has been ranked the highest. I love the PPD (M.Arch II), and the faculty especially Ali Rahim and Winka Dubbledam. But considering the amount I have to pay, I somehow feel there experimental stuff lacks diversity in agendas. They have offerred me half scholarship though, but is still pretty expensive.

A city matters a lot to me, so I wanted to live in LA. I am having a hard time deciding. Would Upenn's Ivy league status matter so much in the future? Is it just me.. but I am kind of really liking the USC program, faculty and electives and the student works! Help please!