Canadian schools in general do not require the GRE.

However:
(1) The GRE is pretty easy. I'm sure you'll do well on the test if you were able to pull off a 3.7/3.8 in school.
(2) From what others have posted here, your GRE doesn't matter that much, especially if you already have a respectable GPA. Your portfolio will matter the most, followed by your personal statement/recommendations.

Hope that helps!

Must "design" schools do not require a GRE like risd, etc. But these schools are very competitive so taking the exam my give u leverage.

I do not know of a list, but you can review all accredited programs via http://www.archschools.org; each entry states their requirements for graduate study including GRE.

I know of one program that does not is the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, the second oldest program in the country.

As a former graduate admissions committee member (at a highly regarded US architecture school,) I can tell you we barely even looked at GRE scores. If you have an excellent portfolio, a solid GPA, and great recs, the GRE is obsolete. I do not take standardized tests well and had a below average verbal score. I still got into (and went to) my top choice. Don't let a lower scores discourage you from applying to any school!

^good advice

Thank you all, I cannot express how much of a difference all this advice has made on me as I go through this undergrad/grad transition process.... I appreciate you all and thank you!

I have also heard that the GRE is not one of the "core" determinants of admissions; however, I wouldn't assume that all schools completely discount the GRE.

I have heard that a score of around 1200 is safe - if the other components of your application are fairly solid. But again, if your portfolio is among the best within the applicant pool, the GRE is less of a factor. Ostensibly, the GRE is used as a "tiebreaker" if two or more applicants are otherwise "equal". I think Rice only considers applicants who score above the 70th percentile on two of the three subjects.

I guess it depends on the school.

Megn252: I'm curious, (since you were a member of an admissions committee) what exactly happens when the committee convenes? I feel like the idiosyncrasies of admissions committees are so arcane. Could you shed any light on the selection process? Of course, if you were forced to sign a blood oath not to reveal any major details, I completely understand.