Southern California Institute of Architecture (SCI-Arc)
Pratt Institute
University of Southern California (USC)
Tulane University
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
Temple University
University of Oregon
Cranbrook Academy of Art
New York Institute of Technology (NYIT)
Kansas State University
portfolio review question
I finally got my hard copy portfolio sent to the schools that required it. Spent I dunno like a hundred hours on it over the past couple of months, at least 20-30 hours on it the week before I mailed out. After mailing it, and looking over the copy that I have to keep I have noticed some errors with notation, a certain graphic does not line up correctly. One of my paragraphs is in 1st person not 3rd person like the rest of the portfolio. And while I don't think there are grammatical errors there probably are some. I worked on this thing literally all the way up until I picked it up from the printer and still missed some things. Basically what I have learned from this experience is that a portfolio is never finished and can pretty much be constantly improved. Are they expecting perfection from these things ? I dunno I guess I am looking for some reassurance and it might not be out there .. PS Ill be posting mine on here soon
They have hundreds to look through. If the minor errors you mention disqualify you I would be surprised.
Doubt they read everything, If you typed a paragraph like the one posted, eh, I'd skip it too. Don't take this comment personally.
Minimal text
Frankly, your commas are in the wrong place. Or nonexistent when such a mark would help. Be a dick all you want but it's a real turn-off to read through something in that format.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.