I've recently completed a masters in structural engineering, and after a year working in the industry I have to admit to myself it is not what I love, and it's time to take the leap into architecture. The only reason I hadn't pursued architecture before this is because of my lack of confidence, and having grown up in a family that doesn't think much of creative areas of work. Understandably, my background doesn't set me up with the exact skills that most applicants would have going into an M.Arch. (and I do need a good chunk of time to assemble my portfolio for applications) so I plan on taking about a year off to gain some basic skills and develop my portfolio, and my question is how to best spend the year.The way I see it there are two options:
1) Enroll at a University to study several undergraduate courses in arch. This gives me the benefit of exposing myself to architecture in the academic setting, but does come with the hefty cost of tuition (currently living in Canada).
2) Spend my time doing self-study to catch up on some much needed skills. This would save the tuition cost, but may not look as good on an application for an M.Arch.
I greatly appreciate if anyone has any words of advice on the two options or just thoughts in general on how I should approach this. Thank you!
saraniki - what is it about structural engineering that you don’t love? That would be the first question. Because, if it’s the firm you’ve been working at that is not satisfying you, look for a more innovative firm. Or, look for a position at an integrated architectural/engineering firm, where you can be exposed to design as well as engineering. That might be all you need to change your outlook on engineering. It would also give you a little insight into the architecture side of things.
If you’ve invested the time get a Masters degree in engineering, I can’t imagine spending another 2-3 years getting an architecture degree would be the answer. Not to mention the extra tuition.
I’m not sure where you are in Canada, but here in Vancouver there are some pretty creative structural engineering firms like Fast + Epp, and I’m sure others that might be a better fit for you. Or even a fabricator like Structurlam, who are doing some amazing engineering projects with mass timber.
That would be my advice to you.
Feb 26, 19 2:17 am ·
·
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.
career / education advice
I've recently completed a masters in structural engineering, and after a year working in the industry I have to admit to myself it is not what I love, and it's time to take the leap into architecture. The only reason I hadn't pursued architecture before this is because of my lack of confidence, and having grown up in a family that doesn't think much of creative areas of work. Understandably, my background doesn't set me up with the exact skills that most applicants would have going into an M.Arch. (and I do need a good chunk of time to assemble my portfolio for applications) so I plan on taking about a year off to gain some basic skills and develop my portfolio, and my question is how to best spend the year.The way I see it there are two options:
1) Enroll at a University to study several undergraduate courses in arch. This gives me the benefit of exposing myself to architecture in the academic setting, but does come with the hefty cost of tuition (currently living in Canada).
2) Spend my time doing self-study to catch up on some much needed skills. This would save the tuition cost, but may not look as good on an application for an M.Arch.
I greatly appreciate if anyone has any words of advice on the two options or just thoughts in general on how I should approach this. Thank you!
saraniki - what is it about structural engineering that you don’t love? That would be the first question. Because, if it’s the firm you’ve been working at that is not satisfying you, look for a more innovative firm. Or, look for a position at an integrated architectural/engineering firm, where you can be exposed to design as well as engineering. That might be all you need to change your outlook on engineering. It would also give you a little insight into the architecture side of things.
If you’ve invested the time get a Masters degree in engineering, I can’t imagine spending another 2-3 years getting an architecture degree would be the answer. Not to mention the extra tuition.
I’m not sure where you are in Canada, but here in Vancouver there are some pretty creative structural engineering firms like Fast + Epp, and I’m sure others that might be a better fit for you. Or even a fabricator like Structurlam, who are doing some amazing engineering projects with mass timber.
That would be my advice to you.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.