Southern California Institute of Architecture (SCI-Arc)
Pratt Institute
University of Southern California (USC)
Tulane University
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
Temple University
University of Oregon
Cranbrook Academy of Art
New York Institute of Technology (NYIT)
Kansas State University
Which Canadian universities offer an accredited Bachelors program in architecture?
Which Canadian universities offer an accredited Bachelors program in architecture?
What would be the fastest route to getting an architecture license in Canada?
None.
There are two paths to becoming an architect in Canada.
Note that there are 10 (or is it 12 now) Canadian universities that offer bachelors in arch studies/science but these are not the same as the american B.Arch. They help greatly, but are not required for most universities to enter their M.Arch programs.
So, fastest way is to do a 4y bachelors degree (preferably in a good architecture school) then a 2y Master's. If you're half decent and find a good office, you can be writing your exams within 2y post graduation since you can take them at 50% internship competition. Note that exams are held only once per year (November typically). After that, just finish those hours and you're good to go... but even then, you're only an architect by title. If you want to stamp your own work, there is a further step and it involves insurance and practice certificates.
Hope this helps.
p.s. Don't take the RAIC route. At least with the typical 4+2 path you get a real degree whereas the other has no formal degree at the end.
I am not entry level by any means, and I am enrolled in the Syllabus. You can make good money while studying at the same time. If your goal is to be a registered architect, the need for a formal degree is mute.
That's because you had past experience. If you're fresh out of high school, you have nothing available to you. The syllabus is a path, but it is not the best one when you have the option. Success rate and work quality is poor on average and few come out ahead.
6 years of formal education for an accredited arch degree is truly ridiculous. I received a 5 year accredited one from a Canadian school way back when they were still offered. First 3 years were absolutely top notch education, and last 2 were as useless as you make of it. Yes, your faculty are experts at igloos and prairie barns, and if your interests are not in the same vain, you will not get much out of that last part. Given that most educators are failed professionals, and you are just jumping through meaningless hoops that still don't prepare you for an actual career in architecture.
You have a few options in the states for an accredited degree. Schools are phasing them out for the obvious money grab of 2 additional years.
It's true there are more schools and options in the USA but given that canadian tuition is almost free (double free if quebec resident), I can't imagine an B.Arch to be a worth while investment for a canadian student. Is that extra year worth 100K more debt?
Agreed. Just grin and bear it Mikelo.
Ouu can you expand on this part??
"if you want to stamp your own work, there is a further step and it involves insurance and practice certificates."
Separate but in addition to becoming a licensed architect, in canada, you need to apply (and pay) for a certificate of practice. This is the stamp that allows you to submit documents for construction and permit. This, at least in Ontario, includes insurance premiums. Plenty of folks think that passing the exams mean they get to stamp shit. It is rarely the case.
In Ontario your stamp needs to be registered with a Certificate of Practice. Like you said you don’t get a stamp and away you go. So if you work for Company A... you registered your stamp with Company A. If you ever quit Company A you need to return your stamp to the OAA. Now if someone works for Company A and wants to do work on the side does one have to open an certificate of practice of their own and get a separate stamp? I’m asking for a friend who is American but working in Canada
Lost, I don’t believe you can have stamps registered to different certificates of practice. If your “friend” is licensed without a personal stamp but registered and practicing under their office’s certificate (very common), i’d be very wary to take side work. Not only would the current employer (holder of original certificate) grant permission, there will likely be heavy legal language involved so that if you get sued while working on the side, nothing can get back to the employer and their insurance. If your “friend” is an OAA member, they have free access to professional practice gurus for more details.
Thanks NS
Oh okay thanks for laying down the facts NS!
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.