Is google broken?

Google is working this morning. I just checked it.

I know Colorado State has an architectural engineering program. I only know because I met a student in the program while riding on a ski lift with them and striking up a conversation. I imagine it is a good program. I'm not sure is artistically focused though like you mention you are interested in. My impression is that it is an engineering program specifically geared to engineering of various building systems, which is not architectural design. Prob you should find that out yourself though.

Here: http://bfy.tw/9BWt

(Be careful of the infinite feedback loop)

I'm sure you realize this, but I just always feel compelled to remind people that an Architectural Engineering degree is an engineering degree, not an architecture degree. 

Stanford has a Masters in Env and Civil Eng with architectural design as an area of focus. I found it on their website. I love the Internet. You don't even to call or request a catalog thru the mail anymore.

I don't know why Arch eng would be more creative. Arch engineering programs are for designing engineered systems of buildings. You might have some architectural appreciation in your courses but architectural engineers don't design buildings. This was the same false impression the student I met was under. Architectural engineers design things like the structure or the systems in a building which may get creative but so could engineering for cars and other things. Architects design buildings which are only partly exercises in engineering. The other stuff is about zoning, programming, circulation, accessibility (ADA) context (historical or existing buildings) and the design involves presenting ideas (pretty drawings) and incorporating feedback (listening and responding) which are not engineering tasks. Sometimes the aesthetic or artistic components of the design are shared with interior or landscape designers or an engineer who specializes like a lighting designer could have aesthetic input on a building but typically engineers are not ever going to be the aesthetic driver of a project. Buildings are subject to laws and the laws as such require an architect which is a very specific thing and while architects have given up a lot of the design of buildings (engineering systems for instance.. MEP, fire protection, environmental control systems) one of the only things they have not given up is the aesthetics except as I mentioned before such as interiors and landscape, lighting. I explained this all to the student I met and it really pissed them off, they thought they were going to be an architect with the arch eng degree but you can't, because you can't sit for the exam which gets u the license and the title. You can sit for the PE exam is all. And if Im wrong, I'd appreciate any corrections. I'm not saying this is right, but it is the system and it is well established. 

In the program at my undergrad they did some design studios, but ultimately it was weighted heavily to engineering, and like tintt said, I think it was a misunderstanding for some of the students.