Southern California Institute of Architecture (SCI-Arc)
Pratt Institute
University of Southern California (USC)
Tulane University
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
Temple University
University of Oregon
Cranbrook Academy of Art
New York Institute of Technology (NYIT)
Kansas State University
MArch II Portfolio feedback
Hi Everyone
I'm currently in the application process for some MArch programs.
Applying to UC Berkeley, TU Delft & University of Toronto
The link is below, I really struggled with the Berkeley requirements in particular so is the version i decided to post here.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8ZFtv-TRBiWdTEtRnkwQ3F4Z0E
I would also like to apply to MIT and the Bartlett, however, I'm not sure my works would fit in those schools and I'd really appreciate some advice on this; Do you think I should pursue the application based on my works?
Any advice, criticism or opinion would be helpful, thank you
I study at the TU Delft you are probs qualified. Your portfolio is a bit busy but at the TU Delft its more about content than layout anyways.
Non Sequitur why do you say that ? I've heard that the program focuses a more on the "art" side of architecture, have you had any experience with the program ?
Cas Esb I know what you mean, I also feel that with this particular version of the portfolio, it's definitely crowded but with the 12 page limit from UC Berkeley it was hard to compress, the TU Delft application I think has a much better flow in the 30 pages.
Any more advice would be really helpful, what do you think about the MIT, UCL? should I give it a shot based on these works or is it just unrealistic? Cold hearted truth please, lol.
Art side? Not sure where you got that from but perhaps it's true since they don't really focus on much construction details or practice.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.