Archinect

More or Less

Catchphrase for the Whatever Generation

 

Archived

Oct '11 - May '13

 
  • anchor

    Post 21: visiting crit—Scott Enge

    farid rakun Jan 21 '12 1

    This week, Scott Enge, a close friend of Bill from his Columbia days, paid us a visit. It was very good, since his presence presented Bill with a down-to-earth no-bullshit sparing partner. They argued (about the advantages of working outdoor vs. indoor, for example) in a very relaxed way, the way best friends do.

    Dymaxion House

     

    He did a short presentation about his fabrication works, visited the Henry Ford Museum (where the only Dymaxion House in existence is installed) with us, and spent the rest of his stay doing desk crits and Thursday major crit. For me, it was the best series of crit in the department so far. With five people critting in our department, and two crit which I had to attend beforehand since I'm taking an elective in 2D Design, it turned out to be a grueling but great day.

    Scott, Bill, and students during Thursday crit

     

    Some important musings I found vital from it all (I'm totally paraphrasing everything based on my own understanding):

    1. Question the value of our endeavor in the school. Ideally it should be an innovation in every sense of the word: technical, economical, and practical. Therefore, the work will not be finished as we graduate, but form a trajectory of our future practice.

    2. Question the role of contractors. Taking it further, I would like to question the role of the construction industry, every single players forming it, therefore architects as well. In our specific circumstances, how do we react?

    3. Thesis as proof. Bill quoted his old professor, Robert Stern, for this. So blatant, I know, but looking at the majority of architectural school thesis works, frequently this is not the case.

    4. On digital realm (and how mistakenly it was taken): an ellipse has a soul. That soul is missing in most ‘digital architecture’ (please decipher it as you wish, and write down your comment on this, thanks).

    5. Shift positions between author & implementer accordingly in the process of design. Refuse to be a prisoner of certain technique and method.

    6. Position your work as ‘the other’, relating to conventional building practice. The dialogue between them can be a rich breeding ground for your real-world strategies.

    7. Sometimes, in life, to move forward we need to put each of our own gifts away. Evolve. Ha!

    Again, blatant, but I guess my ignorance caused me to be blind all this time: I am in an institution which is truly deeply rooted in the tradition of modernism. Question is, what will I do about it?

    Will update on my quest for answers.

     

     

     
    • 1 Comment

    • SDR
      Jan 21, 12 10:31 pm

      "4. On digital realm" -- I'd love to know what he (or you ?) mean by "and how mistakenly it was taken". . .   The ellipse as an artifact of nature, of the realm of geometry, holy and "right" -- and abused by the "super-ellipse" and every badly-drawn circle-in-perspective ever made on paper (you should see how Wright's boys mangled it !).  So -- doesn't the software get it right every time ?  Or do I miss the point . . .

    • Back to Entry List...
  • ×Search in:
 

About this Blog

A school blog on Arch Dept, Cranbrook Academy of Art. By farid rakun, admitted Fall 2011.

Affiliated with:

Authored by:

Other blogs affiliated with Cranbrook Academy of Art:

Recent Entries


Please wait... loading
Please wait... loading